SITE NEWS: We are moving all of our site and company news into a single blog for Sports-Reference.com. We'll tag all PFR content, so you can quickly and easily find the content you want.
Also, our existing PFR blog rss feed will be redirected to the new site's feed.
Pro-Football-Reference.com ยป Sports Reference
For more from Chase and Jason, check out their work at Football Perspective and The Big Lead.
More on Jerry Rice
Last week I did this bit on Jerry Rice. That reminded me of something I wrote about Jerry several years ago. I know I'm flogging a straw man here, but just in case you ever run across one of those people who thinks Montana and/or Young made Rice, here is something you can point to.
Where WRs are concerned, there usually isn't too much debate, but there still is a small segment of the football world that does not believe that Jerry Rice is the greatest WR of all time. That group separates into two subgroups:
- The people who think Don Hutson is the greatest WR of all time.
- The people who think Rice's otherworldly numbers need to be discounted because he benefitted so much from playing with Montana and Young for the majority of his career.
The Hutson group has a legitimate argument. I'd vote for Rice over Hutson, but it's close, and that's for another article. What I'd like to do right now is take a look at the Montana argument.
Clearly, Rice benefitted from playing with Montana and Young. No one disputes that. The question is: by how much? That's an impossible question to answer, but what we can do is look at the seasons during which Rice was working with a non-Montana/Young QB for a substantial amount of time:
- In 1986, Rice's second year, Montana only played 8 games. The other 8 featured Jeff Kemp and Mike Moroski at the QB position for the 49ers. Kemp and Moroski threw 47 percent of the team's passes that year. Rice had 1570 yards and 15 TDs on the season, leading the league in both categories.
- In 1991, Steve Young spent some time on the shelf. Steve Bono and Bill Musgrave threw 242 passes that year, 46 percent of the team's total. Rice's numbers were 1206 and 14.
- In 1995, Young was injured again, and Elvis Grbac threw 30 percent of the 49ers passes. Rice had 1848 receiving yards and 15 TDs.
- In 1996, Grbac and Jeff Brohm threw 42 percent of the 49ers passes. Rice went for 1254 and 8.
So during those four seasons, during which Kemp, Moroski, Bono, Grbac, and Brohm were QBing the 49ers 41 percent of the time, Rice averaged 1470 and 13. And really only one of those seasons was during what would tyically be considered a wide receiver's prime years.
Further, while I don't have game-by-game breakdowns for 1986 or 1991, I do have them for 1995 and 1996. During the 9 games where Young did not play during 95 and 96 (plus a game where he threw only one pass), Rice had 908 yards and 9 TDs. That comes out to 1453/14 over a 16-game season. So Jerry Rice, at age 33 and 34, with Elvis Grbac and Jeff Brohm at QB and Derrick Loville and Terry Kirby at RB, was putting up numbers that could arguably pass for the best season of Cris Carter's or Steve Largent's career.
And then there are the Jeff Garcia and the Rich Gannon years.
Rice's two worst seasons to date were the two seasons when Garcia was the 49ers primary QB. In 1999, he went for 830/5, and he posted 805/7 in 2000. But he had a good excuse: he was 37 (and 38) years old. Only two receivers in NFL history, Rice and Charlie Joiner, have caught 800 yards worth of passes at age 37 or older. Only a hanful of receivers in NFL history have caught any passes at age 37 or older. It's easy to be blinded by the standard Rice had set for himself, but apart from one Charlie Joiner season, these two disappointing seasons were the best in NFL history for a man of his age. And then he moved to Oakland and blew those seasons away.
What more could he have done?
Just to stave off the flood of pro-Hutson comments, I'll confess that I wrote that piece four years ago and, although I'm pretty sure I had good reasons for it at the time, I no longer remember why I'd prefer Rice to Hutson.
This entry was posted on Tuesday, August 29th, 2006 at 4:23 am and is filed under General. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

I was wondering as I read this article if the #1 WR wasn't actually hurt by having a great QB. The reasoning went something like a great QB makes all the reads, and throws it to the best person, while a younger/inexperienced QB may just want the safest target. Any thoughts?
Great stuff.
Though I hear more people disparage Young and Montana for playing in a great system with great talent (esp. Rice) than I hear people disparaging Rice. But that could be from my time in WI and friendship with Packer fans, who try to expose "flaws" of every great QB so they can prop up Favre as the greatest.
David, here is a post that vaguely touches on your question: CLICK ME
Also, don't forget how good Rice was in Oakland. He was still playing receiver at an all-pro level at age 39. I find that to be one of the most impressive athletic achievements in history.
Prop up Favre as the greatest, ha, like that's hard. Just kidding. I do think he is top 5. As discussed, every quarterback is affected positively or negatively by his receivers and vice-versa. That was why this piece was interesting, it showed consistency from Rice regardless of who threw him the ball. There are still other variables, but it seems almost indeniable that Rice was not only the greatest receiver ever, but also, in my opinion, the greatest football player ever.
Please, please, please can we see an opponent by opponent breakdown of Rice's accolades. Please!!!
Wish I could help you, Bill. But I only have game-by-game data back to 1995.
Doug, if I were to assemble the data, would you post it? That being said, any clues as to where I could find it??
Never mind... found the raw data.... once i assemble the table, will you post it??
I compiled the data by opponent and stored it in a comma delimited file... where should i email it???
[...] Support pro-football-reference.com « More on Jerry Rice [...]
You also need to remember Hutson played in an era when you had to work after your football career was over. The guy was still the best by far in his last season with the Packers catching 47 passes for 834 yards (17.9 per catch) and 9 TDs (the equivalent of 75 for 1,326 and 15 TDs in a 16-game season).
* Rice led the league in receptions twice (in 20 seasons).
* Hutson led the league in receptions a record eight times (in 11 seasons).
* Rice led the league in receiving yards six times.
* Hutson led the league in receiving yards seven times, including a record four years in a row (1941-44).
* Rice had four 200-yard receiving performances in 303 career games.
* Hutson had four 200-yard receiving performances in 116 career games.
You also need to remember that Hutson played in a league where black players weren't allowed to compete, in a time before defensive specialists, and, most importantly, had his prime years when the league's talent level was decimated by the draft.
When you look at the stats other receivers managed to put up before the war (eg Gaynell Tinsley) and immediately after the war (eg Jim Benton), you start to see that Hutson probably wasn't as far ahead of his time as wartime circumstances made it appear.