SITE NEWS: We are moving all of our site and company news into a single blog for Sports-Reference.com. We'll tag all PFR content, so you can quickly and easily find the content you want.
Also, our existing PFR blog rss feed will be redirected to the new site's feed.
Pro-Football-Reference.com » Sports Reference
For more from Chase and Jason, check out their work at Football Perspective and The Big Lead.
Patriots Rant
Warning: You should check this post first.
Now that that's out of the way, I'm going to go on a Patriots rant. This might become a two day rant. I'll probably be jumping around from topic to topic incoherently. Artistic writing this will not be. Maybe Wednesday I'll try to explain why the Colts are going to beat the Patriots on Sunday (I hope). But for now, this is just a rant. This is what happens after watching another Patriots playoff win. I normally try and ground my posts in well thought out objective analysis (whether I succeed is another matter), but I'll mince no words here. I hate the Patriots. A lot. For a million reasons. It's incredibly frustrating watching them win in the playoffs, and this is my current form of therapy.
Let's get into it. I'm going to give a Green spin on all of this because I feel like it. If you're partial to the Patriots, you might as well stop reading here. I imagine this is what Yankees haters felt like in the late 90s, only those Yankees were actually really good teams.
January 1997: You may remember this one. The Patriots were headed to the Super Bowl (yes, the Patriots won games before Tom Brady arrived, shocking I know), but Bill Parcells was heavily rumored to be the next Jets head coach. Patriots fans rightly blame Parcells for not having putting 100% of his mind into the Super Bowl, because owner Robert Kraft never makes a mistake.
February 1997: The Jets have the first pick in the draft, and Kraft won't give up Parcells for anything less than that. So the Jets hired Parcells to be the team consultant (a position above head coach, and therefore Parcells could leave New England for that role without compensation) and hired Parcells' defensive coordinator in New England to be the Jets new head coach. Because Bill Belichick was getting upgraded from assistant to coach, viola, the Jets got their men and the only casualty was the spirit, and not the letter, of the league rule. The Jets opened acknowledged that Parcells would be the head coach the following season. I can't defend this action on many moral grounds here, so let's just move on.
Parcells then signed a six year deal as Consultant/Chief of Football Operations, including four of the years in the contract with him designated as head coach. Parcells said that "I will coach a minimum of four years and hopefully more. I wanted to make sure they knew I was here for the long haul." He coached three years and then retired, never to be heard from again.
The Patriots and Jets would finally broker a deal to let Parcells coach the Jets in 1997. New England received the Jets 3rd (Sedrick Shaw) and 4th (Damon Denson) round picks in 1997, a 2nd in 1998 (Rod Rutledge) and a 1st in 1999 (Andy Katzenmoyer). Suffice it to say, I don't think those picks worked out well for New England. They also traded a first and a third in 1998 for Curtis Martin, which became Robert Edwards and Chris Floyd.
The Patriots ended up signing former Jets HC Pete Carroll to be their new HC. Why didn't Kraft go after Belichick?
I had plans to talk to Bill Belichick about coaching. But Parcells's departure had created such a whirlwind, a storm, and I couldn't talk to his people. We were just left in such turmoil and uncertainty, and I knew that Parcells would be taking the staff with him. We thought it was better to start fresh.
Anyway, we'll move on past this, but one note must be addressed. Remember that number one pick in 1997? Well, it was supposed to be Peyton Manning. But he pulled a reverse Eli Manning, and chose to not go to New York, and instead return to Tennessee for his senior year. The Jets ended up trading the pick to the Rams, who drafted Orlando Pace. This led me to hating Manning more than anyone in the world right up until...well, just keep reading.
So why do I keep harping on all this stuff from 1997? Because in the contracts Belichick and Parcells signed, it called for Belichick to take over as head coach when Parcells stepped down. But after the 1999 season ended, the Patriots wanted Belichick to be their new HC. Parcells had one year left on his contract, but felt very loyal to the late Leon Hess, the Jets owner that had died several months before. Parcells did not want to let Belichick go now, coach the Jets for one more year and retire, and then leave the Jets without either Bill. So on January 3rd, 2000, Bill Parcells stepped down as head coach, and Belichick took over as Jets head coach.
So what did the classy (I'm with you Mr. Tomlinson) Belichick do? Said nothing, as the Jets set up a press conference to announce him to be their new head coach. And as he stepped to the podium...well I'll let the newspaper take it from here.
He returned to his office and scribbled out a resignation that he delivered to [Jets President Steve] Gutman five minutes before the news conference.
"Due to the various uncertainties surrounding my position as it relates to the team's new ownership," it started, "I have decided to resign as the HC of the N.Y. Jets."
Defensive line coach Romeo Crennell, what do you have to say?
"Bill walked past and said, 'I'm going to resign,' " Crennel said. "That was a shock."
Ok, but Bill, a handwritten resignation note? Are you serious? How can that be?
"I don't know how to use a computer."
Yes folks, the most intelligent person of all time can't turn on a computer.
But fine, who cares what these suits have to say anyway. What did Belichick say to the team?
"I thought it was weird that after Coach Parcells retired, that Coach Belichick didn't at least address the team," [Offensive Tackle Jason] Fabini said. "After Parcells said what he had to say and left the room, there was a lull of 10 or 15 seconds. We're waiting for Coach Belichick to come in and address us, and tell us something, which was sort of weird, you know. After a while, we just got up and left."
The next day, Fabini was in the trainer's room watching television and what he thought was going to be Belichick's first public comment as the new coach. Instead, Belichick resigned. "I called Jumbo," said Fabini, speaking of teammate Jumbo Elliott. "He didn't know what was going on. He thought I was lying to him. I said, 'John, have you turned on the TV at all?' "
Ok, that's just the players. They don't sign your contract, right Bill! What about the owner, the late Leon Hess?
Shortly after the AFC title-game loss (where Belichick's defense allowed 23 points in the second half), Belichick received a $ 1-million bonus from Hess to remain with the team, dismissing overtures from the Kansas City Chiefs and Chicago Bears, among others.
Oh. So a dying man's wish for you to remain the team + 10,000 Ben Franklins isn't worth much. Perfectly understandable. What about the thoughts of your mentor, Bill Parcells?
Belichick's excuse about things changing with the death of Mr. Leon Hess was weak. Mr. Hess had been dead for seven months. The potential buyers of the Jets were all told by Goldman, Sachs that Belichick, by contract, would automatically be the next coach as soon as I stepped down. I don't know how you can take a million dollars bonus to stay another year to become the head coach and then walk out on the job . . . He tried to tell me after 18 years of being with me, he felt I owed him that opportunity to coach New England if that is what he wanted to do. I wasn't going to do that."
So the Jets have a new owner for the first time since 1963, their head coach retired, their replacement head coached bolted town, and their star wide receiver was traded to the Tampa Bay Bucs. Things looked terrible for the Jets, but a draft with Chad Pennington, John Abraham, Shaun Ellis and Laveranues Coles would help keep the Jets afloat. The Jets had a winning record in 2000, and swept the Patriots and their new HC (nice defense Bill, allowing 2 fourth quarter TDs in a 20-19 loss, and allowing 34 points in the second meeting), and the Pats were 5-11. All was right in the world.
Then the new Jets HC became the old Jets HC, as Al Groh resigned after just one year. But the Jets hired Herm Edwards, who seemed pretty good, and was bringing in some smart assistants. Everything will be fine, I'm sure. In 2001, the Jets started off 1-0, the Pats started off 0-1, and the Jets were winning 10-3 in the Patriots home opener in week 2. The Jets were on track to win the division, and the Pats were on track to get the first pick in the draft. All is good. Let's just wrap up that final quarter...
Bledsoe was knocked out of the game by Jets linebacker Mo Lewis in the fourth quarter of the Jets' 10-3 victory. Bledsoe, who has missed just 6 of 130 games in nine years in the N.F.L., was hurt on third-and-10 from his 19 with about five minutes left. He ran around right end for an 8-yard gain before being hit hard by Lewis in front of the Patriots' bench.
Bledsoe stayed on the ground for about two minutes. He returned for the next possession, but Tom Brady played the final series, with the Patriots needing to score a touchdown to tie or go ahead. Brady was 5 for 10 for 46 yards and led New England to the Jets' 29 before he threw four incompletions to end the game. Brady, who leapfrogged over the more experienced Damon Huard in training camp to be the No. 2 quarterback, will start Sunday against the Indianapolis Colts.
Hmm. Some guy named Brady against the Colts? That doesn't sound very good, does it? What's your prediction ?
COLTS (2-0) at PATRIOTS (0-2) Sunday, 1 p.m. Even with QB Drew Bledsoe, the Patsies would have had little chance here. With him out at least two weeks, their slogan becomes "Going Belly Up With Belichick." This one looks too easy. The Colts' offense has shredded the Jets and Bills, allowing a second-rate (at best) defense to slide by. The soft 'D' will catch up with Indy in January, but not this week. Bledsoe's sub, Tom Brady, wasn't even that good at Michigan, and his line and running game are poor. Although the Colts lost in Foxboro last year, a repeat would be stunning. Peyton Manning names the score. The pick: Colts.
Amazingly enough, Brady's whole career is a microcosm of his first game. The underdog Patriots beat the Colts, 44-13. And Brady gets the credit...while throwing 13/23, 168 yards and no scores.
I've documented why I hate Bill Belichick. I hate Tom Brady just as much, but for an entirely different reason. The best sports comparison is probably how Red Sox fans feel about Derek Jeter. Brady is put up on a pedastal like he's the greatest QB in the history of the world, and that he can do no wrong. This is what really, really bugs me. His supporters like to say Tom Terrific can never lose a big game, but when the Jets knocked the Pats out of the playoffs in December 2002, Patriots fans said it wasn't a playoff game so Brady is still immortal. Yes, once Brady knows it's a playoff game, he becomes superman and can't lose! Until the Broncos game last year. That was a bummer.
But still, 12-1 all time in the playoffs! This guy is incredible! And then he goes out and throws three INTs against the Chargers, and absolutely should have thrown at least five. The only people with worse hands in the stadium than the Chargers DBs were the Chargers WRs. How in the world does Brady get the credit for that win? I started seeing the signs already, people saying how Brady led them to that victory. The Chargers absolutely gave that game away, and yet Brady supporters will point to that 13-1 record as if Brady should be sainted.
It's the combination of Belichick/Brady/playoff smugness that Pats fans have that is incredibly frustrating. I told one of my Patriots fans friends how the Pats were very lucky to win that game and were outplayed. He agreed, but said the Pats kept their composure but the Chargers didn't, and in a close game the better coached team won. Sure, the Pats kept their composure...like when the ref didn't notice one of the Pats DBs (I think Ellis Hobbs) throw a punch after a play yesterday. These mythical reasons why the Pats win is infuriating. And to make matters worse, hearing any talking head discuss the Pats is sickening. Did you hear Jim Nantz in the booth? I couldn't tell if he had been replaced by Tom Brady's father at one point. And of course he quickly brushed off the Hobbs punch and went on to something else. We can't shatter the image of the Pats being holier than thou.
I hear Pats fans complain all week about Shawne "steroid" Merriman. Last time I checked, the Patriots punter was a known steroid user. But Pats fans like to sweep that under the rug and say "Bill Belichick would never put up with a showboat cheat like Merriman."
Anyway, let's get back to Brady.
In the 2001 regular season, Brady did pretty well, and very well for a second year player. Cool. He wasn't one of the top 10 QBs in the league, but no one thought he was. Then the playoffs came. And the tuck rule came.
I remember exactly where I was when I saw that play unfold. Up until that point, the Jets, Dolphins and Pats had long been battling for AFC East supremacy. All three teams had made the playoffs in recent years, and all three were usually in the region between good and great. I remember watching Charles Woodson celebrate the 4th down incompletion, wave his towel on the sidelines...and then see the call get overturned. And I remember getting a feeling that the Pats were going to win the SB because of this. I quickly brushed it off and said no way, this team just isn't that good. Then the clutchest playoff kicker to ever miss two chip shot FGs in a Super Bowl comes in and wins the game for the Pats. Ugh.
Somehow, Brady became the story line. He averaged 6.00 yards per attempt, and had 0 TDs and 1 INT in the game. That's not a good game. Yes, I know it was snowing, but let's not make a game with zero TDs and one interception (and another should be fumble) into a good game.
But whatever, there's a little undeserved Brady hype. No big deal. The Steelers should romp the Pats, right? Well let's just go to the game recap...
On fourth-and-6 from his own 13, Pittsburgh's Josh Miller punted the ball to the Patriots' 23 -- 64 yards after it skittered behind Brown. But Pittsburgh's Troy Edwards was called for illegal procedure for stepping out of bounds and coming back in. So the Steelers had to rekick.
Cowher said the officials lined up the ball on the wrong hashmark when they respotted it after the penalty. He said that was one reason Brown punted the ball down the middle. "In my mind that's inexcusable," Cowher said. Brown took the ball back down the middle in the other direction for a 55-yard touchdown return that made it 7-0 with 3:42 left in the first period.
OK, so the Patriots get a big break, what's new. Anything else crazy happen?
Early in the second half, the Steelers moved from their own 32 to the New England 16, where they lined up for a field goal. But Brandon Mitchell blocked it, Troy Brown picked up the ball at the 40 and ran 11 yards before lateraling to Antwan Harris, who took it 49 yards for the score that made it 21-3.
Ok, so two kick returns for TDs go a long way. How'd Brady do? He was 12/18 for 115 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT. Brady got hurt in the first half, and Drew Bledsoe came in and led the Pats to their only offensive TD and a FG, which means Brady wasn't responsible for any of the 24 points scored by the Pats that day.
Up comes the Super Bowl....that's where Brady becomes Joe Montana and Johnny Unitas, but better, right? Brady averaged 5.37 yards per attempt that day, in a largely nondescript performance. The Pats had an INT returned for a TD by Ty Law, and an INT returned for 30 yards that set up a FG. In the 4th quarter, with the Rams coming back from their three turnover day, Brady's Pats went 3 and out twice in the final ten minutes. Finally, New England got the ball back where Brady led "THE DRIVE". Right?
Starting on the Patriots' own 17-yard line with 1:21 remaining, Brady picked up a first down with an innocent 8-yard dump to J.R. Redmond for a first down. He hooked up with Redmond again two plays later for an 11-yard reception and another first down at the New England 41. [In between there was a five yard dump to Redmond].
Brady threw incomplete, then connected with Troy Brown over the middle, and Brown managed to turn up field and get out of bounds at the St. Louis 36 for a 23-yard gain. Now, with only 21 seconds left, Brady threw a short pass in the right flat to tight end Jermaine Wiggins, who fought his way to the Rams' 30-yard line. Brady calmly spiked the ball to stop the clock with seven seconds to play.
Where is the great play here? Was it "calmly" spiking the ball? Brady "led" a drive by dumping the ball off while the Rams played a prevent defense, and then his kicker hit a 48 yarder to win it. Pats fans watch that drive and noticed how poised Brady was, but there was of course nothing special about it.
Brady's final post-season numbers: 60/97, 572 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT and he led his team to 13 points in four quarters against the Raiders, 0 points against the Steelers, and 10 points against the Rams. Never did a QB get praised more for doing less.
Then the Patriots hype started spinning out of control. The Patriots running out of the tunnel at midfield is "the coolest thing ever" for some reason, in the minds of Patriots fans. We even had to hear talk of how "wonderful" it was that a team named the Patriots won the Super Bowl following the 9/11 attacks. Patriots fans are incredibly defensive about this team and this title, and don't recognize how lucky New England was to win that Bowl.
As a follow up, the Pats missed the playoffs in 2002. The Jets made it, in large part because they beat the Patriots in Foxboro on national TV in week 16, which I thought was impossible. But we quickly learned that when the Patriots lose a game, it's never a big game.
Anyway, that's enough of a rant for now. More on Brady, Belichick and the rest of the Patriots talk tomorrow, if I'm still in a rantin' kind of mood.
This entry was posted on Monday, January 15th, 2007 at 3:18 am and is filed under Intense hatred, Rant. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Man, nice rant!
I watched the game yesterday. To be fair (sorry), Brady had a nice series at the end of the first half and played well at the end of the game.
But, in support of Chase's points, the Chargers gave the game away.
First, you don't intercept a ball downfield on 4th down when surrounded by opposing players. You slap it down. Had the DB done this (can't recall who it was), another Pats drive would have stalled.
As a long-time Browns fan, I am familiar with Marty's defensive philosophy while sitting on a lead: retreat! I like Marty Schottenheimer for the most part, but this is his weakness as a coach. Had he done more to get in Brady's face at the end of the first half, that TD may well have been prevented.
Anyway, cheers for a persuasive post. Now I hate the Pats too.
I'm not a Pats fan myself. I love this site. But in fairness I've never read such an inaccurate accout of events. Ur using stats, events etc to justify your rant. Theres an important stat called the Law of Averages....Pats 3 superbowl wins...enough sad.
That was a good start of a rant. You'll feel better by finishing it.
Wow, that was intense. It'll be hard for Pats fans to credit Brady with the win. If the Colts had lost, though, for once, they would have been justified in blaming Peyton.
Brady is a very good quarterback and a good person. That said, I'm sick of hearing about him (and how great he is) too. He plays on a great team that wins a lot of games for him.
Now print something about my Bears, and their chances against the Saints (probably not good. Depends on which Grossman shows. We got a combination of both of them yesterday).
My god, are you that jealous of TB? The fact of the matter is that he is that good. You can pick apart any good QB's stats and games and then highlight the mistakes but TB consistantly makes up for them. Is he perfect? Hell no, and he'll be the first to admit it. The bottom line here is that when the game is on the line, he is at his best and does not usually make mistakes. You'd better try and get over it because he is going to be around for a while and I suspect that he'll be lifting a few more Lombardi trophies before all is said and done.
I hope Part II includes a rant on the absolutely awful bandwagon nature of the fans. It's worse than San Francisco and it's right up there with Dallas. Everyone in the media was salivating over an NE-Dal matchup. But seriously, when the Pats go 4 - 12 (or hopefully 1 - 15) again, Gilette Stadium will be 70% empty.
Ben:
The Bears chances depend more on their defense. I suppose the defense made some plays when they had to, but it looks like the Bears will have to match score for score against the Saints, who have a more explosive offense. And we come back to wondering which Rex will appear, which is a lot more fun than criticizing the defense. I've strayed too far. This is an interesting premise, choose the team you hate most and explain.
I hate the Cardinals. Yes, it's a given to hate the Packers and Vikings. I can only pity the Lions now.
Chase,
Thank you for sharing. I don't know much of the stuff that went on between the Jets and Patriots, etc...
I'm a little wore out with the Patriots, but whaddya do? It relates a little to their fans, and Red Sox fans, and hearing how great they are and how much grief and heartbreak they've gone through. Please! Try ours (Chicago Bears, Cubs, Sox...) on for size.
It sounds like you are just mad at the media and public's reaction (especially Brady) to the Patriots, not the team itself.
As for Belichick as the HC of NYJ, there are lot of different stories about how exactly that went down, and he truth is that that everyone looks bad. Any story where Bill Parcells comes off as honorable is probably a false one.
I've hated the Yankees all my life, but always thought the Red Sox' whining about all the "what might have or should have been" was even worse.
Well, it doesn't work for Jets fans either.
After being the laughing stock of football for 40 years, I have to say, I LOVE my team being hated now. Thanks!
Last week Peter King called him the best QB we'll see in our lifetimes.
I had never heard the part about Belichick basically stealing $1 Million from the Jets.
You can't be lucky all of the game all of the time. Not for 3 years and over 50 games in the space of 4 seasons. Its easy to quote all the negative stats. I think you are simply hiding the positive stats so as to get across ur view. The more I read this the more I think it supports how good the Pats really are and have been. And I'm a cowboys fan for my troubles. If you want to thrash the Pats do it constructively. If you cant do that then keep rants to urself cos it has the opposite effect
"your" and "yourself"
Don't forget the capital letter and the full stop Richie.
Chase, here's some advice on how to cleanse your polluted mind: don't follow the NFL for at least a year.
Couldn't agree more with that rant. Keep it coming.
Excellent rant!
The Patriots are a very well coached team, and the players are intelligent, focused, motivated, and probably likable enough as far as professional athletes go.
Moreover, Belichick himself acknowledges how lucky the Patriots have gotten in the playoffs before. (The tuck rule, etc. -- he is quoted as listing all the lucky things that went their way in either The Education of a Coach or Patriot Reign, both of which I read last week and they now run together for me.)
But the Patriots fans, many of them, are seemingly oblivious to how lucky their team has gotten. Which is kind of annoying.
1) The 2001 Patriots were, without question, the luckiest Super Bowl champion of all time, and the worst team to ever win a Super Bowl. They were probably outplayed in all three of their playoff games, yet somehow won them all.
2) That being said, they were far and away the best team in football over 2003-04.
3) Since 2002, Tom Brady has been one of the best QBs in the league, and that should be obvious.
4) I'm convinced that Bill Belichick is the best coach I've ever seen, in any league, at any level, in any sport.
Look back on Belichick’s entire career as a head coach AND defensive coordinator. Belichick has been a defensive coordinator or head coach in the NFL for 21 seasons (his list of jobs appears as the bottom of the page). His teams have made 11 playoff appearances in those 21 seasons and have played in 26 postseason games.
In 6 of 26 games, he’s faced a quarterback who went on to the Pro Football Hall of Fame (Montana 3 games; Elway 2; Kelly 1).
In 3 of 26 games, he’s faced a bona fide future Hall of Fame quarterback (Manning 2, Favre 1).
In 11 of 26 games, he’s faced a quarterback who has won an NFL MVP Award (12 MVP awards total: Favre 3, Warner 2, Montana 2, Manning 2, McNair 1, Gannon 1, Elway 1).
In 22 of 26 games, he’s faced a quarterback who has appeared in at least one Pro Bowl (opposing QBs have made a total of 60 Pro Bowl appearances).
(Hall of Famer Steve Young made a token appearance against a Belichick team in 1990, but we did not include his two MVP awards or seven Pro Bowls in the above calculations.)
Belichick’s teams have a 21-5 (.808) postseason record.
It’s a record that’s been built upon defensive dominance. In those 26 games, Belichick’s teams have surrendered just 392 points, an average of 15.08 PPG, facing some of the best players and offenses the NFL could throw his way.
I have to disagree with The Babaganoosh on the bandwagon nature of Patriots fans. Back in Belichick's first year with the Pats the team went 5-11, following up the Pete Caroll era where they went 10-6, 9-7, and 8-8. Yet Foxboro Stadium, which back then was the worst stadium in the NFL was sold out for every game. This was before the Super Bowl wins, so don't go calling Patriots fans bandwagon jumpers, I as a Patriots fan take offense to that. As for the rant I by and large agree with Vince and maurlie's points.
Honestly, it's not even a matter of how good or bad they are. It's how unbelievably smug they are about it. As if they somehow deserve every win and how no losses are their fault. The two years of Rodney Harrison complaining about "no respect" just go to nail home this point.
And Tom Brady is not even close to one of the greatest QBs of all-time. All you have to do is knock him down a few times and get some consistent pressure and he turns into a completely different QB who constantly makes mistakes. The only reason he 'looks good' at the end of halves and games is because the other team is playing prevent and not getting any pressure on him.
Of course, it's hard to knock him down with his 'five layers of protection' constantly holding for him!
I wouldnt say any sport--Phil Jackson is the man, and I hate basketball.
That said, the Pats are the best coached team in the league, even if the guy is a prick and dresses like a douche on game day.
Re: 19
I'd make an argument for the 1980 Raiders as the absolute worst team to ever win a Super Bowl, but there is no doubt the 2001 Pats were ridiculously lucky and are certainly among the all-time worst Super Bowl winners of all time.
I think most sane Patriots fans recognize how lucky the 2001 Super Bowl season was. But that's part of why it's treasured - not only was it the first Super Bowl for the franchise, the people who had been watching the team the whole year did not expect a Super Bowl run from the team.
Chris said:
Honestly, it’s not even a matter of how good or bad they are. It’s how unbelievably smug they are about it. As if they somehow deserve every win and how no losses are their fault.
When have they ever blamed losses on someone else? It should be easy for you to research this, since they haven't lost too many games over this "unbelievably smug" period.
21, I think that Phil Jackson's current struggles illustrate that he may not be that great of a coach. How hard is it to coach a team of Jordan, Pippen, Rodman, Kukoc, etc? Same with Shaq and Kobe?
Richie:
Couldn't the same be said for the Patriots? Brady, Dillon, an All-Star defense?
It's hard to win Championships, no matter who is on your team. 7 is unbelievable. John Wooden is another shoe in.
Regardless, I stand by my earlier statement regarding the Pats coach:
"That said, the Pats are the best coached team in the league, even if the guy is a prick and dresses like a douche on game day."
And Shittenheimer is the worst coach in the league. His management of this past weekend's game was embarrassing. I would have fired him after the 3rd quarter...and San Diego might have won.
Just another whiny Jets fan.
You are pissed because it appears that the "football gods" favor the Patriots for now and have cursed the New York teams.
The Pats have been the luckiest bastards the past six years. So were Jeter and the Yankees in the late 1990's.
Go back to the 1996 Baltimore playoff game and the non-interference call when 12-year-old Jeff Maier reached over and snagged the ball in the field of play that turned Jeter's long out into a homer and a tie game in the bottom of the eighth... just like the tuck rule... Game One goes to the Orioles and they win the playoff and there is no Yankee dynasty and Joe Torre is not headed to the Hall of Fame.
The Yankees took advantage of the breaks that went their way just as the Pats do... just as all good/great teams do. Luck favors the prepared team.
Chill. Your animus is showing. Your perception of the "facts" is as well.
You castigate Belichick for taking a better job after accepting $1M to stay, ignoring that Parcells was under contract for the next season while he was secretly negotiating from the phone in his hotel room during Super Bowl week. Looking for his next big paycheck while not earning his current one.
Were the Giants not a 'lucky" team as well? Parcells is no genius if Scott Norwood makes that field goal in 1990.
Appreciate Namath's winning Super Bowl III in 1969. His numbers were not so impressive but he did get all the credit.
It's the only Super Bowl Greenie fans will ever celebrate.
#24
most sane Patriots fans
I refuse to believe such a thing exists.
Keep it coming, Chase, keep it coming.
Oops, typoed the end-italics.
Go Bills
I hope when you get to the 2006 encarnation of the pats that you mention that Brady is throwing to a reciever the chargers didn't want back (Caldwell), a reciever who recieved only 1 other offer as a FA two years ago (Brown), a reciever who was out of football at the start of the season (Gaffney), a rookie (Jackson), and two players from the practice squad (Kight and Childress). I'm sure your next rant will show through selective statistics that they are just as good as Harrison and Wayne, or Rice, or whatever you need to do to "prove" that Tom Brady and the Patriots have won 13 plaoyoff games, 3 super bowls, and 5 AFC East crowns.
Doug, that you let this idiot take over YOUR blog in particular is ridiculous. Ba-bye credibility.
How many game winning touchdown drives under 2 minutes does Brady have? All of the great ones have them, but I can’t think of one from Brady.
Does anyone have the answer?
Here are problems with your hatred -
Belichick was lied to by the Jets about how much authority he was going to have as head coach; Parcells was going to pull all the strings. Belichick did the only correct thing and bolted.
You cite the September 2001 rout of the Colts as a microcosm of Brady's career because of pedestrian-looking stats. As Cold Hard Football Facts has long shown it is not raw yardage or pass attempts that matter, it's efficiency. And Brady has been the most efficient quarterback in the modern NFL.
Tom Brady's game-winning drive in SB 36 may have been the smartest such playoff drive ever because Brady CONTROLLED THE BALL. Again you obsess over his stats and ignore that he DID THE JOB.
"How many game winning touchdown drives under two minutes does Brady have?" Here are some of his comeback wins -
2001 vs. Chargers - led three scoring drives worth 13 points in final six minutes plus OT for a 29-26 Patriots win; game-tying touchdown to Jermaine Wiggins in final 30 seconds of regulation.
2001 @ Bills - led GW-scoring drive in OT.
2001 Divisional Playoff vs. Raiders - led three scoring drives worth 13 points in fourth quarter plus OT for 16-13 Patriots win.
2002 @ Bears - Rallied team from down 27-6 and 30-19 in final 22 minutes for 33-30 Patriots win; GW touchdown to David Patten with 30 seconds to go.
2002 vs. Dolphins - led three scoring drives worth 14 points (three FGs and one TD w/2-point conversion) in final five minutes plus OT for 27-24 Patriots win.
2003 @ Dolphins - 82-yard TD to Troy Brown in OT for 19-13 Patriots win.
2003 @ Broncos - GW-touchdown to David Givens in final 40 seconds for 30-26 Patriots win.
2003 @ Texans - tied game at 20 with TD to Daniel Graham in final 40 seconds; game won in final minute of OT on FG.
2005 @ Steelers - led GW-scoring drive in final three minutes for a 23-20 Patriots win.
2005 @ Falcons - GW-scoring drive in final four minutes of 31-28 Patriots win.
2006 Divisional Playoffs @ Chargers - led two scoring drives in final seven minutes for 24-21 Patriots win.
2007 @ Colts - led two touchdown drives in final ten minutes for 24-20 Patriots win.
BTW, here's one that should have been added -
2007 @ Ravens - GW touchdown to Jabar Gaffney in final minute of 27-24 Patriots win.
One other thing - when you pick off the ball with 6.5 minutes left you DON'T slap it down, you advance it. The idea that the Chargers just gave the 2006 playoff game away is nonsense.
Chase, you retard. Chargers suck, Jets suck, Colts are okay, Cowboys suck. And you suck.
Tomlinson is a whiny bitch who blames others for his mistakes. Rivers is a millimeter away from the Arena league.
Patriots are the elite of the league. Brady is the absolute best QB in the NFL.
Period.
Oh, by the way. The Jets are far and away one of the most inept, laughable franchises in sports. Mangina is a clown. Please, let us know when the Jets field an NFL caliber team.
Tim, check Gerald Eskenazi's 1998 book GANG GREEN: An Irreverent Look Behind The Scenes At 38 (Well, 37) Seasons Of New York Jets Football Futility.
"I can fart farther than you can kick!" So said Walt Michaels to kicker Chuck Ramsey after the Seahawks scored off a blocked punt against the Jets in 1979. That and other often-hilarious stories are all over the book and explain why the Jets are a poster child for inept sports teams.
Eskenazi should write a follow-up going through the 1998-2007 seasons - more years of Jets football futility, from the Belichick Era that wasn't, the Football Man (Parcells) who wasn't, the roller coaster of the Herm "You play to win the game!" Edwards era, and the beginning of the Mangina Era.
I respect your analysis but I still beg to differ on Brady. He is, has been, and probably always will be, a winner. There's no stat that measures that. In that respect, Roethlisberger is much like him. They just win. And that, afterall, is the most important stat.
It's very possible that both of these guys end up in Canton. And it'll be because they win. They wont throw for an average of 275 yds/game and they wont average 35 TD's a year, but in the end, what does it matter? Winning is and always will be the most important stat. And these guys know how to do that. When Brady is on, and he usually is, he is so difficult to stop. His accuracy is unmatched, and his coolness under the pressure... it's like he doesn't even feel it. I'm still shocked the Giants beat them in that SB. Taking nothing away from the Giants (they won it and deserved it), but you give Brady another 90 seconds on top of the 35 he had and he pulls the win out. Sometimes people can get caught up in stats, and they certainly do reveal things. I'm a stat guy myself, but winning is the most important stat there is. Ask Dan Marino.
One other Brady comeback win needs to be added to the list above -
2009 vs. Bills - threw touchdowns to Ben Watson in final six minutes for 25-24 Patriots win.
hahaha, ahhh its great to read this and just be able to look at what Brady has become sine these posts. As of now, Dec 2010, he just whomped the New Jersey Jets 45-3, and has 3029 yds, 27tds and only 4 picks. Amazing line. Yeah, TB is up there with Manning...PS Manning is sitting at 24tds and 15 picks and a sterling 89.4 passer rating...loving it
Do you really hate BB and Brady? sounds to me like you really hate the media and the NFL Officials.
As a Red Sox fan I will also respond that I do not hate DerekJeter, or Joe Torre for that matter. I'm not terribly fond of Steinbrenner, but i Don't despise him either.
The player I resent is Johnny Damon, who was part of the 2004 Red Sox squad that "reversed the curse" by defying the odds and beating the Yankees 4 straight and then sweeping the cards for the Red Sox's first 'Series win since 1918. He was a long haired, full bearded member of "The idiots"
Then, the very next Offseason, Instead of re-signing with the team that just won the World Series, he signs with the arch-rival Yankees.
Yes, I know he got a more lucrative contract, and there really isn't any real team loyalty in professional sports, but you should be able to see why the timing of it all leaves a sour taste in my mouth.
If prevent defenses don't work why were they used?
The impressive part of the 2002 superbowl-winning drive against that yard allowing prevent defense is that he recognized the defense as being weak to short dumps, and then threw them.
If dump passes succeed against a defense then thats what should be thrown, if the defense is weak to hand-offs, hand the ball off. Sure a 50+ heave is impressive, but the reason its impressive isbecause the sucess rate is so low. I think Its a mark of a good QB to run whatever play is needed.
And as to intercepting vs creating turnover on downs.
I humbly submit that Scoring a touchdown in 1-3plays is better than a 20 play drive that eats up 10 minutes of clock but doesn't result in a touchdown. at defending a lead.