SITE NEWS: We are moving all of our site and company news into a single blog for Sports-Reference.com. We'll tag all PFR content, so you can quickly and easily find the content you want.
Also, our existing PFR blog rss feed will be redirected to the new site's feed.
Pro-Football-Reference.com » Sports Reference
For more from Chase and Jason, check out their work at Football Perspective and The Big Lead.
Losing Tiki
The Giants will in 2007 be without Tiki Barber, who was the league's 4th-leading rusher in 2006. I thought I'd take a quick look at teams who lost a top-10 rusher and see how much their offensive production suffered. Since 1970, there have been 25 such squads. Here is the quick summary:
YearN YrN+1
========================
RshYd/G 114.4 102.9
Yd/Rsh 4.14 4.00
Att/G 32 33
PassYd/G 224 226
PassTD/G 1.40 1.28
INT/G 1.15 1.25
Points/G 21.7 20.3
After losing the top ten rusher, these teams ran slightly less, passed slightly more, and were slightly less efficient in both phases. The net effect was a drop of about a point and a half per game.
But hold on. Teams with excellent performances in a particular category will tend, as a group, to regress regardless of whether they lose key players or not. Look at the year-to-year comparison of teams that had a top-ten rusher in Year N and then did not lose him the following year.
YearN YrN+1
========================
RshYd/G 124.3 115.2
Yd/Rsh 4.26 4.10
Att/G 29 30
PassYd/G 206 211
PassTD/G 1.30 1.28
INT/G 1.14 1.17
Points/G 21.9 20.9
If these figures are to be taken as a baseline, then it appears that losing a top-10 rusher has historically cost an offense something like 0.4 points (compared to what they might have scored had they kept him). And interestingly, it's the passing game, not the ground game, whose efficiency seems to decline more. There are all sorts of little things that could be affecting the data we see here, but I think it's safe to say that, at the very least, the Giants have a chance to maintain their 2006 level of production this season.
Allow me to state clearly, before some helpful soul points it out for me, that the Giants are not the same entity as the average of 25 different teams from the NFL's past, and that their future is not determined by that average. Those 25 teams include some, like the 1999 Colts, who had great running backs (Edge James) ready to step in, others, like the 1999 Lions, who had a grim lot to choose from (Greg Hill was their leading rusher), and all points in between.
Tiki Barber will be replaced by some combination of Brandon Jacobs, Reuben Drouhgns, and possibly rookie Ahmad Bradshaw, a seventh round pick from Marshall who has a skill set vaguely similar to Barber's and is garnering some minicamp kudos. The one thing that seems clear to me is that, five years from now, if someone runs a similar study, it will be easy to see why the Giants 2007 rushing attack turned out like it did. If Jacobs can be as good in a featured role as he was in limited time, people will say, "it was obvious that teams like the 1999 Colts and 2007 Giants would continue to run the ball effectively. They had fantastic young backs ready to step in!" If Jacobs turns out to be too stiff, Droughns can't revive his Denver self, and Bradshaw follows the same career path as most 7th-round rookies who garner minicamp kudos in May, people will say, "it was obvious that teams like the 1999 Lions and 2007 Giants would have big dropoffs. They had absolutely nobody to replace their departing star!"
Predicting their fate right now is, of course, a much trickier proposition. But I will say this: according to these aggregated fantasy draft results, you can probably get Brandon Jacobs and Eli Manning by using your 4th and 7th round picks, and that seems like a good package for the price. If Jacobs turns out to be the real deal, you got yourself a great runner in the 4th round. If not, then the Giants will throw about 600 times and Eli will rack up some numbers in spite of himself.
I'll leave you with a quick look at the 25 other teams who lost a top-10 rusher:
Year N Year N+1
Tm Yr Top-10 rusher RYd/G Y/R RYd/G Y/R top rusher
=======================================================================
ind 2005 Edgerrin James | 103.6 3.95 | 107.9 4.15 (Addai)
den 2004 Reuben Droughns | 128.8 4.49 | 139.7 4.72 (Anderson)
mia 2003 Ricky Williams | 98.8 3.61 | 65.9 3.50 (Morris)
den 2003 Clinton Portis | 139.9 4.74 | 128.8 4.49 (Droughns)
nor 2001 Ricky Williams | 84.0 4.02 | 93.4 4.20 (McAllister)
min 2000 Robert Smith | 99.2 4.99 | 59.8 3.67 (Bennett)
bal 2000 Jamal Lewis | 124.4 4.30 | 104.5 3.87 (Allen)
ind 1998 Marshall Faulk | 89.0 3.90 | 98.8 4.14 (James)
det 1998 Barry Sanders | 102.9 4.28 | 68.4 3.58 (Hill)
sfo 1998 Garrison Hearst | 127.1 5.02 | 111.2 5.00 (Garner)
nwe 1997 Curtis Martin | 89.4 3.91 | 89.0 3.90 (Edwards)
phi 1997 Ricky Watters | 111.4 4.18 | 99.7 4.13 (Staley)
min 1994 Terry Allen | 91.8 3.81 | 92.7 4.31 (Smith)
nwe 1993 Leonard Russell | 104.1 3.64 | 79.9 2.97 (Butts)
min 1992 Terry Allen | 108.4 4.18 | 93.5 3.80 (Graham)
ram 1989 Greg Bell | 115.0 4.24 | 97.9 3.94 (Gary)
sdg 1988 Gary Anderson | 101.6 4.63 | 96.1 4.33 (Butts)
nyg 1988 Joe Morris | 94.6 3.38 | 103.9 3.27 (Anderson)
sdg 1984 Earnest Jackson | 104.5 3.80 | 103.3 4.10 (James)
atl 1983 William Andrews | 129.8 4.58 | 111.5 4.08 (Riggs)
was 1979 John Riggins | 134.4 3.83 | 115.9 3.90 (Jackson)
sfo 1977 Delvin Williams | 141.6 3.78 | 119.2 3.64 (Simpson)
bal 1977 Lydell Mitchell | 141.1 3.75 | 121.7 3.93 (Washington)
nyj 1975 John Riggins | 144.4 4.20 | 121.6 4.28 (Gaines)
dal 1974 Calvin Hill | 149.8 4.35 | 146.9 4.07 (Newhouse)
This entry was posted on Monday, June 4th, 2007 at 7:10 am and is filed under Fantasy, General. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Of the 25 situations listed in the bottom table, here is a summary of what happened:
5 teams experienced a gain in both yards per game and yards per rush.
1 experienced a gain in yards per game and a drop in yards per rush.
4 experienced a drop in yards per game and a gain in yards per rush.
15 experienced drops in both yards per game and yards per rush.
Based on Doug's findings, teams losing a top-10 running back reduce their average number of points scored per game from 21.9 to 20.3
Based on this fact alone, you're crazy not to get rid of your top-10 running back any time you get one.
If you recall last year's discussion, teams who score 20 points have a higher winning percentage than those scoring 21.
Just kidding, but someone had to point that out
Most fantasy drafts are in late August. I think Jacobs sitting in the late 4th is not really happening in late August. I think most fantasy owners will see much of the preseason and be able to better assess Jacobs worth. So, this might be a valid strategy if your draft is prior to August, but I suspect Jacobs value is actually somewhere more like 12-24. If Droughns eats away at his carries significantly, its more of a later pick than 48 or so. Jacobs situation of undervalue is more based on Droughns workload risk and not Jacobs sucking risk. As for me, I am betting on the side of Jacobs and NOT betting on Eli. So, if Jacobs is there at 48, take him. And take him before a lot of other dues on that MFL ADP list that rank higher than 48.
I just did the Jacobs/Eli package in my current dynasty draft (most of which happen this time of year), with Jacobs @ 41 and Eli in the 9th round. And Bradshaw for the hell of it in the 16th. I don't think Droughns will be a factor quite honestly.
now back to the regulary scheduled comments, just wanted to second the Jacobs/Manning package deal...
On the current ADP for MFL, Jacobs is 25th RB and 48th overall. See if you agree with me on this…
Subjectively,
I would probably rank him about 20th on this list. I did this by glancing at the list and there are probably about 15-20 guys I would trade jacobs straight up for. I tried keep in a redraft frame of mind. As and example, I think Carnell Williams stinks - so that bumps him up to 24. You get the picture. How, how about this objective analysis...
Lets say there is a 50% shot of Jacobs being featured. If he is featured, he has another 50% shot of being "Barber of 2005" and 50% shot of being "Barber of 2006" If he is not featured, he gets his own 2006 value (as Droughns presumable is "Barber of 2006".
So:
50% 98 points (rank 36 rb)
25% 189 points (rank 9 rb)
25% 263 points (rank 4 rb)
Ave 162 points (rank 13 rb)
#13 RB is McGahee, who is #14 overall on the current ADP chart.
If you like this analysis but don't like the probabilities I assigned to the outcome, come up with your own and recompute. I think it will be hard for you to come up with a probability breakdown that puts him at his current value (25 rb/48 overall). And when it appears he is, in fact, a 200 poont calibur dude do not be surprised when some yahoo in your league blow a late 1st on him - and perhaps in the end rightly so.
Just sayin.
Just for fun I replaced the 50% with 98 points with these numbers: 25% with 0 points and 25% with 98 points. So, the average is now 136 points which puts him at 25-27ish on the RB rank which is where is he now. I was hoping he'd still be above 25th rb but he wasn't so poo. Now you nay sayers have something to cling onto. I am banking on the 263 poonts.
http://subscribers.footballguys.com/2007/currentproj-rb.php (I think this link is still free. If not, monkeytime, it projects Jacobs as RB23.)
The 2000 Ravens not only lost Jamal Lewis, they also lost Priest Holmes. Talk about a blow.
A team's regression to the mean is an overpowering factor in these types of studies. The draft, salary cap cycles, and the scheduling system all contribute to this trend.
One other cause is luck. Teams with high numbers of wins (and accordingly, lots of rushing yards) are likely to have been lucky on at least a game or two. That luck isn't likely to happen two years in a row.
they lost priest holmes before he was priest holmes though.