SITE NEWS: We are moving all of our site and company news into a single blog for Sports-Reference.com. We'll tag all PFR content, so you can quickly and easily find the content you want.
Also, our existing PFR blog rss feed will be redirected to the new site's feed.
Pro-Football-Reference.com ยป Sports Reference
For more from Chase and Jason, check out their work at Football Perspective and The Big Lead.
Why is Norm Van Brocklin still a record holder?
Proof that we read your e-mails: Eddy Elfenbein e-mailed us on September 28th, asking:
I was curious if you had thoughts on the possibility of someone breaking Norm Van Brocklin's single-game passing mark of 554 yards. This might make for a good post. The odd thing about this record is that it doesn't seem at all "beyond reach." I don't know exactly how you can measure such outliers, but consider that there have been 227 400-yard passing performance, including five already this year. Yet no one has managed to catch Van Brocklin's record, which is 59 years old today. We all know that Joe DiMaggio's streak is in another realm. We get excited if someone gets half-way there. But with the passing mark, it's as if there are three or four 45-game streaks each season but they all seem to peter out.
That's a great question, Eddy. Why is NVB, in this modern age of passing, still a record holder? Consider:
- None of the top 45 leaders in single-season pass attempts per game in league history occurred before 1980.
- Only one of the top 60 leaders in passing yards per game in a season -- Joe Namath in 1967 -- came before 1980. None of the top 150 leaders in this statistic came before 1951, the year Van Brocklin set the single game record.
- On the other hand, Van Brocklin was no slouch: he's a Hall of Famer and came in at right behind John Elway in my final quarterback rankings. He also led the NFL in yards per attempt in '50, '51 and '52 (and again in '54), although he split time with Bob Waterfield in each of those seasons. He split some time with other quarterbacks for most of his career, in fact (this was common at the time), and a result, he never led the league in yards per game. On September 28th, 1951, Waterfield was out injured, enabling Van Brocklin to take all of his team's snaps.
High passing games weren't incredibly rare the '40s and '50s -- Jason's boy Johnny Lujack threw for 468 yards in 1948 against the cross-town Cardinals -- but they're certainly more common now. There have been 192 team passing games of 400 yards or more (this includes sack yards lost, which individual passing yards do not): 59 have come since 2000, 37 in the '90s, 47 in the '80s, 4 in the '70s, 25 in the '60s (16 by the NFL, 9 from the AFL), and 10 each in the '40s and '50s. It's tempting to think of NFL history as following a linear path, but that's not accurate: we think of modern times as a pass-heavy era and the '70s as the run-heavy era; but that doesn't mean the '50s and '60s were even more slanted towards the run. In fact the '40s, '50s and '60s had their pass happy moments, as Waterfield and Lujack (and Baugh, Luckman, Graham and Unitas) made evident. But we'd expect the biggest passing games to come now, when there are far more teams and many more games than ever before. Since 2002, there have been 512 team-games per season with a chance to put up 554 yards; in 1951, there were only 144. So how the heck did Van Brocklin throw for so many yards in one game?
The Rams of the early '50s
Joe Stydahar's Rams from '50 to '52 were the greatest show on grass a half century before the modern games. They ranked first in points in all three years, possessing a dominant offense in every way possible. Los Angeles led the league in passing yards in 1951, and as a team threw for 541 yards against the Yanks (13 yards lost due to sacks); the Rams threw for 427 in a game in 1950, and threw for over 300 yards in half their games that year. The '52 team broke 300 yards only twice, topping out at 358 yards, but that team led the league in net yards per attempt for the third consecutive year. They were the dominant passing offense of their day, but they were far from one dimensional. Two running backs made the Pro Bowl each season, with Glenn Davis (yes, Mr. Outside) and Dick Hoerner doing so in 1950, and then Dan Towler and Tank Younger earning those honors in each of the next three seasons. Towler, Younger and Hoerner were coined the "Bull Elephant Backfield:"
"The idea for the bull elephants," Dan recalled, "came during the 1950 season. We were playing a game in a sea of mud, and the coaches alternated backfields hoping to rest us. The coach then realized he had three fullbacks of equal running ability and saw what a powerful weapon he would have with two 200 pounders leading a third. "The next season, all of us were used together in rushing situations, as the year progressed, we were used as a unit more and more. We won the title that year, and I feel the `51 Rams was one of the greatest teams ever."
The passing game was even scarier, with Waterfield and Van Brocklin throwing to to two Hall of Famers (Elroy Hirsch and Tom Fears). A lineup of Van Brocklin at quarterback, Towler, Hoerner and Younger in the backfield, and Hirsch and Fears on the outside would cause nightmares for every defense they faced. But that was especially true on September 28, 1951.
554 -- Naming your number
If you look at the boxscore from this game, a bunch of things jump out at you. The first, of course, is Van Brocklin's stat line: 27 for 41, 554 yards and 5 touchdowns. And the Rams beat the New York Yanks, 54-14. But you'll also see that it was a Friday game. Why? I have no idea. On Saturday, USC would host San Diego Navy in the same Coliseum, in what would be a more compelling game (the Trojans won by only 34). The Rams and other teams occasionally played on Fridays in late September, but I don't know much beyond that. The game was the season opener for both teams -- clearly the Yanks needed some more pre-season games. As it turns out, the fact that the Yanks were playing on the same field that day goes a long way towards explaining why Van Brocklin was able to set that record.
We've written about Ted Collins' 1951 Yanks before. They went 1-9-2, finished last in points allowed and points differential, and were sold back to the NFL after the season (and purchased by Giles Miller's group and moved to Dallas). This was barely a professional football team, and they scored both of their touchdowns against the Rams on defense and special teams. They passed for a dismal 8 yards against Los Angeles on that Friday night, despite dropping back 41 times. In the rematch later in the season -- also in Los Angeles -- the Rams mercifully took the air out of ball, rushing 44 times for 371 yards and 6 touchdowns.
If you put Peyton Manning against a semi-pro team, he could surely throw for 560 yards if he wanted to. The question is, why would he want to? In the opener, the Rams were up 21-0 after the first quarter, and 34-0 in the first half. A punt return for a touchdown by the Yanks before half-time may have helped L.A. keep their foot on the gas; similarlly, a 30-yard fumble return score in the 4th quarter might have been the motivation Stydahar and Van Brocklin needed to keep passing. Still, 42 passes in a 40-point win seems a bit high, no? There have been only 9 games in league history where a team was up by at least 25 points at halftime and still threw over 40 times in the game. Two Belichick teams are on the list (the '09 curb stomping against the Titans and the Sunday Night masscare against the Bills in '07), and Brady had over 370 yards in both games and 11 combined touchdowns. Another came by the Bengals where they threw 40 times and ran 39 times, in a 38-7 win over the Vikings fueled by 7 Minnesota turnovers.
Another came by Andy Reid and Donovan McNabb, although McNabb threw 28 times for 303 yards and 5 touchdowns by half-time. Then we've got Marino against the Jets (when the margin was cut to 11 early in the 4th), Daryle Lamonica, when he threw 6 touchdowns in the first half against the Billas in 1969, Johnny Unitas against the 49ers in '67, and a blowout by the Eagles in 1954 when both Bobby Thomason and Adrian Burk played against the Cardinals. The 9th game? Van Brocklin's record-setting performance against the Yanks. I wasn't there, but we can safely assume that NVB padded the stats just a little bit. A New York Times report indirectly backs it up:
Van Brocklin almost made it six touchdown passes in the closing moments but Tommy Kalmanir was pulled down a yard short and Dan Towler punched it across. The Rams set a league record when they piled up 735 total yards, topping the old mark of 682 set by the Chicago Bears in 1943. Their 34 first downs beat by two their own record.
It's unclear how many times the Rams threw up by 33 in the 4th quarter against a team that hadn't scored a point on offense all day, but it's hard to see why the answer would be more than zero. Without a play-by-play listing of the game, it's tough to know exactly how many of Van Brocklin's 554 yards came in "garbage time," but it highlights a key reason why he still holds the record: teams don't pad their stats the way they used to.
In the '50s, if a team was throwing for 450 yards in a game, it was probably because the other team was really bad. Parity didn't exist 50 years ago, and the spreads between the great teams and the bad ones was enormous. Van Brocklin throwing for 554 against the Yanks was a "name your number" sort of game, similar to when the Florida Gators play the Citadel. Van Brocklin could have been pulled at half time (and perhaps would have if Bob Waterfield was healthy) and it would have had no impact on the game. Now, quarterbacks set passing records when they play "good" teams, not "bad" teams. A high-scoring shootout could produce a 500-yard game; but if your opponent isn't keeping pace, you're not going to keep throwing passes all game (unless your team keeps turning the ball over near the goal line). The stats back this up: take a look at the the history of 400-yard games over the last 70 years. The table below shows the number of games in each decade (lumping the 4 weeks so far this season with the '00s) with a 400-yard passing team, their number of attempts, their opponent's number of passing yards and attempts, and the points margin after the first, second, third and fourth quarters.
Gms Pyd Att OPyd OAtt Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2000s 59 432 48.1 246 32.7 0.0 0.8 0.2 1.1
1990s 37 432 49.0 259 35.3 -1.6 -1.1 -1.0 4.2
1980s 47 434 47.7 252 34.3 -3.0 -1.8 -2.2 2.5
1970s 4 454 38.0 174 26.0 -1.3 1.8 -1.5 3.5
1960s 25 432 40.2 209 32.2 4.4 9.5 12.0 17.5
1950s 10 437 40.4 132 33.4 5.4 13.3 24.6 26.6
1940s 10 436 38.7 202 31.7 1.0 9.3 12.5 18.8
192 437 43.1 210 32.2 0.7 4.5 6.4 10.6
In the '40s and '50s, 400-yard games often came in blowouts; now they almost always occur during close games. Six of the 10 games from the '50s came when the 400-yard passing team was up by at least 14 points at halftime; of the five 400-yard passing games this season, three of them came with the big passing team down by at least 10 points at the break. In Van Brocklin's era, you put up huge numbers against terrible teams; now, quarterbacks put up huge numbers when they're forced to throw from behind.
So how does a modern passer throw for 555 yards? Clearly, they need to throw early and often. That can come from a great, accurate quarterback playing a team with a terrible pass defense and a high-scoring, high-octane offense (think this Drew Brees game against the Broncos in 2008); or if you don't allow a ton of points, be sure to turn the ball over a lot and have your linemen forget to block for your running backs (as in this Brian Griese performance against the Bears two years ago - and getting to overtime helps, too). The classic shootout is always nice: Ben Roethlisberger threw for over 500 yards in a 37-36 win over the Packers when Aaron Rodgers was similarly efficient for Green Bay, evoking memories of a Manning-Favre classic from '04 when both went over 350 passing yards. If you can get as many of the ideal factors below into one game, you're in good shape (great quarterback play, assumed):
- Ineffective running game
- Ineffective red zone play, by either settling for field goals, failing to convert on downs, or turning the ball over
- A defense that gives up big plays, and an opposing offense that can move down the field quickly
- An opposing defense that isn't very good, and is also prone to big plays (lots of completions and long drives drain the clock)
- Overtime.
Get all of those factors into a game played by Peyton Manning, Tom Brady, Drew Brees, Matt Schaub, Jay Cutler, Philip Rivers, Ben Roethlisberger, or Kyle Orton, and NVB's record just might fall. Tom Brady threw for 345 yards and 5 TDs against the Titans in the first half of a game last season; he ended the day with 380 yards. If there's one thing you've learned from this post, it should be that the "name your number" days of football are over.
This entry was posted on Friday, October 8th, 2010 at 7:01 am and is filed under General. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Similar to how no QB has thrown 7 TD passes since 1969. And some of the QBs that did do that weren't too good in their careers. Those older teams seemed perfectly content with running up the score. Today, you'd hear about it from the media constantly. The announcers during the game would be talking about it.
555 will happen some day though. It might take an OT game. Imagine if that Packer/Steeler game from last year was 37-37 after Ben's pass and he got the ball 1 or 2 times in OT. He could have broke the record then.
Excellent article. I've noticed the same trend - games with ridiculous passing numbers being produced by either teams in a big lead at half time with 250+yds passing taking their foot off the gas, or teams down by multiple scores having to heave long and often.
Thanks for a great stat fix!
As far as I know, the closest anyone came to breaking the record was Marino against the Jets (In a game they lose, no less). After looking it up, it was 10/23/1988.
Not only did Marino have 521 Yards, but I also seem to remember him throwing a bomb late in the game that Duper outright dropped (Thanks to internet research I was almost correct)
St. Petersburg Times (Florida)
October 24, 1988, Monday, City Edition
Miami's Troy Stradford dropped a deflected Marino pass in the closing
seconds that would have been a 41-yard touchdown. McMillan intercepted
another desperate heave by Marino on the next play with two seconds left.
This might be the most likely single game record to be broken.
You also have to keep in mind that this was a time that QBs called all the plays and that NVB was an incredible ass. He was exactly the kind of guy who would run up the score.
Some of the ideal factors posted above were present on 12/16/1990 when Warren Moon threw for 527 yards against KC in Arrowhead. But the most compelling factor was the run-and-shoot offense the Oilers employed. They threw the ball 2/3 of the time, ranking first in passing attempts and last in rushing attempts. Moon had a stable of WRs to throw to, including Haywood Jeffires (who set a record that day for receiving), Drew Hill, and Ernest Givins in a four-WR set with lonely Lorenzo White as the RB. When KC used its bump-and-run coverage on the Oilers Moon decided he could throw to his left and to his right as the coverages dictated. And it was not so much bombs-away as it was finding success with intermediate-range pass-and-catch.
One thing that might have also been working in Moon's favor as far as stats paddage was concerned was penalties. The Oilers had 12 flags for 86 yards that day. Not sure how many were committed on offense, but I remembered watching that game on TV and thinking that Moon had a good chance to break the record when Steve Deberg's end zone INT resulted in a touchback for Houston. The Oilers had one pass-heavy drive end up with a missed 39-yard FG and had to settle for two more three-pointers from Teddy Garcia. This kept the game relatively close.
If Christian Okoye had been in the backfield for the Chiefs that day I doubt that Moon would have thrown for over 500 yards as KC was a pound-it-out offense with Barry Word and Okoye getting a strong workload and Steve Deberg operating a play-action style passing game.
Back then the Oilers, Lions, Falcons, and Bills each had their own version of the run-and-shoot which made for long afternoons of football viewing.
If anybody else is interested, there have been 41 performances of 450+ yards since 1960:
500+
Warren Moon* 12/16/1990 527
Boomer Esiason 11/10/1996 522
Dan Marino* 10/23/1988 521
Phil Simms 10/13/1985 513
Drew Brees 11/19/2006 510
Vince Ferragamo 12/26/1982 509
Y.A. Tittle* 10/28/1962 505
Elvis Grbac 11/5/2000 504
Ben Roethlisberger 12/20/2009 503
475-499
Jake Plummer 10/31/2004 499
Matt Schaub 9/19/2010 497
Joe Namath* 9/24/1972 496
Billy Volek 12/19/2004 492
Boomer Esiason 10/7/1990 490
Tommy Kramer 11/2/1986 490
Doug Williams 11/16/1980 486
Kurt Warner 11/25/2007 484
Vinny Testaverde 12/24/2000 481
Ken O'Brien 9/21/1986 479
Joe Montana* 10/14/1990 476
Kyle Orton 9/26/2010 476
450-475
Tommy Maddox 11/10/2002 473
Dan Marino* 9/4/1994 473
Peyton Manning 10/31/2004 472
Kurt Warner 9/28/2008 472
Brad Johnson 12/26/1999 471
Dan Marino* 12/2/1984 470
Vinny Testaverde 10/16/1988 469
Neil Lomax 12/16/1984 468
Billy Wade 11/18/1962 466
Jake Plummer 11/15/1998 465
George Blanda* 10/29/1961 464
Donovan McNabb 12/5/2004 464
Drew Bledsoe 9/15/2002 463
Gus Frerotte 11/19/2000 462
Steve Young* 11/28/1993 462
Don Meredith 11/10/1963 460
Joe Montana* 12/11/1989 458
Jacky Lee 10/13/1961 457
Neil Lomax 9/20/1987 457
Tommy Kramer 12/14/1980 456
Troy Aikman* 11/26/1998 455
Philip Rivers 9/26/2010 455
Jim Everett 11/26/1989 454
Marc Bulger 11/10/2002 453
Marc Bulger 1/2/2005 450
Dan Marino* 10/1/1995 450
Donovan McNabb 11/15/2009 450
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/play-index/tiny/dAoII
This does seem like one of the most likely NFL records to be broken within the next few years. One record I doubt will be broken, though, is the Rams' passing yardage margin of 533 in that game (541-8). Wow.
You know, it's funny ... I was going to mention that I didn't understand the comments thinking the record would be broken, given that the point of the article is that it's not that likely ... but here we are, the very first Sunday after this was posted, and Philip Rivers has nearly 300 yards in the first half of a game the Chargers trail by 1.
Well, it would seem to be easy break, but, time is always a factor, and I think that takes the air (pun not really intended) out of a lot of those 450+ games.
If it does get broken it will probably be a game where there is no defense and no running game. And both teams probably end up trading quick strike TDs all game. And probably goes to OT.
Course, with the play index last night in I found a game that was the anti-Van Brocklin. In 1974, Joe Ferguson in a whole game in Sept. 1974 went 0 for 2 for the game. (I was looking for fewest team pass attempts since 1970 in a game, by the way)
And they won the game I think. Partly because, O.J. and FB Jim Braxton ran a combined 48 times for 200+ yds. ANd the fact opposing QB Joe Namath was better at throwing to Bill defenders than his receivers (an ugly 2-18 with 3 INTs)
Just an interesting tidbit.
It will take, most likely, one of the league's all time great offenses to do the trick. There have been only about a half dozen teams in my estimation that had a powerful enough offense to compile stats like that - those Rams of the late 40's early 50's, the Bears of the early 40's, the Dolphins of the mid 80's, and the 2007 Patriots. A couple others scattered here and there - some of the Unitas Colts, perhaps? Isn't it interesting though that those Pats were certainly guilty of running up scores, and passed the ball a ton, yet Brady never approached the record. And those Rams were, IMHO, the greatest offense of them all, in particular the 1950 version. Consider that the '07 Pats averaged 4.2 offensive TDs a game, while the '50 Rams averaged 4.9 - albeit in a 12 game schedule as opposed to 16, which would extrapolate to 78-79 touchdowns! (The '51 Rams averaged an even 4.0). The point here being that it took arguably the greatest offense of all time to produce that kind of passing performance, and to see it duplicated would likely require something similar. Also, one would likely need to be a vertical passing team, as opposed to a controlled passing team. It's hard to consistently compile yards when the ball is only traveling 5-10 yards half the time.
Running up the score still happens, if one has the offense capable of doing so, as the '07 Pats demonstrated. Remember how the Jimmy Johnson Cowboys were constantly being accused of that? And none of those team ever came close to the kind of production those aforementioned teams.
Re: #9: That game was played in bad weather, specifically strong winds that made passing nearly impossible.
Another factor (briefly alluded to earlier) is that in a blowout, the head coach is much more likely to pull a starter late in a blowout and let the backups get in for garbage time.
Can't agree with your assessment of the '51 Yanks as "a semi-pro team". That team had two Hall of Famers (Donovan and McCormack), a Pro Bowl running back, a couple of decent QBs, a pretty good fullback, and Buddy Young.
Fine, they went 1-9-2 and finished last in point differential (-141). The '53 Cardinals were even worse, 1-10-1 and -147; were they semi-pro? The '54 Cardinals were 2-10 and -164. This is a team that had existed for 30 years and won the NFL Championship less than a decade prior. Was it "barely a professional football team"?
The '58 Packers went 1-10-1 and were last in points allowed and point differential, every bit as bad as the '51 Yanks. Were the Packers, the year before Vince Lombardi took over, a semi-pro team? How about the 2008 Lions or last year's Rams? Semi-pro? Equivalent to something like the Rocky Mountain Football League?
Any of those teams would rule the CFL, which is a fully professional league, albeit a 2nd-tier one. Those were all legit NFL teams; they were just really bad. Van Brocklin vs the Yanks was not Peyton Manning vs the Helena Titans or Tom Brady vs Middle Tennessee, or even Florida vs Citadel. It was the '07 Patriots against the '08 Lions, or something to that effect: a great team, a legendary offense with a ruthless play-caller, running up the score against an overmatched opponent on its worst day.
Your point that the Rams ran up the score against an outmatched opponent is relevant and sound; there's no need to exaggerate or make things up. The '51 Yanks were a bad team, even a very bad team. They were not, however, a marginal pro team, and it's misleading to suggest that they were. There have been half a dozen NFL teams as bad or worse just in the last decade.
Brad (#13), what if Chase had instead said it was a semi-pro defense? I don't think anyone you listed was stopping Norm Van Brocklin from scoring at will.
James (#14), I'd argue against that, too. First of all, semi-pro is basically weekend warriors, guys who are nowhere near NFL caliber. Semi-pro leagues are comprised mostly of players who couldn't make a CFL or Arena League roster.
But even if we assume Chase really meant leagues like the CFL or even the USFL, there's just no way that's right. The Yanks allowed only 7 points more that season than Green Bay. Did the Packers have a semi-pro defense, too? That's amazing, 1/6 of the NFL being semi-pro defensively. Last year's Lions, to choose one example, were probably at least as poor, but they're obviously a pro team. There's "bad", which the Yanks certainly were, and then there's a different level, which is pretty clearly what Chase meant using phrases like "barely a professional football team" and "semi-pro".
The '51 Yanks had pro players. In fact, they had standouts. Art Donovan was a Hall of Fame defensive tackle. Don Colo played nine years and made three Pro Bowls. Joe Golding was a good defensive back. Art Tait led the league in fumble return TDs. The team generated 34 turnovers, 9th in the 12-team league, which is not particularly good, but obviously implies professional-caliber play.
But let's make this really, really obvious. The '51 Yanks had a lineup very similar to the '50 Yanks, who went 7-5 and had a defense that was close to average.
There's a team every few years that's as bad defensively and overall as the '51 Yanks. These teams are not fundamentally apart from the rest of the NFL, not teams that might struggle in the CFL or NCAA. They are teams that would dominate those leagues, but that are bad NFL teams. The '51 Yanks were such a team.
I'm in general agreement with Brad on this - though perhaps not as adamant!
There's another way of looking at this also. 1951 was the end of the golden era of touchdown scoring in NFL history - offensive TDs were at an all time high of just under 6 per game (both teams) in 1948 (it's at 4.5 today) and the era featured some truly great offenses - the Rams, of course, but also the Browns under Paul Brown and Otto Graham, the Eagles with Steve Van Buren, the Dream Backfield of the Cardinals, Bobby Layne and the Lions, Sammy Baugh's Redskins and of course the first great offensive team, the Luckman Bears. A bad defense against this kind of lineup is going to get lit up, and the Yanks (and the Packers and 'Skins) certainly did. As bad as the Lions of the last three seasons ('07-'09) have been, the only near elite offenses that played at the same time would have been th '07 Pats and the Saints of the last two seasons. Teams just don't score as many TD's today.
Though, one point in favor of them being a de-facto semi-pro team: this group of players eventually needed a semi-pro QB to bring them to relevence two cities and two organizations later (Yanks/Texans/Colts).
The ending comments about running up the score are appropriate. Teams ran up the score in the past, college teams have made a tradition of running up the score every year for decades, but it happens now - in the pros - and we're supposed to be offended. seems more like homer whining and media stirring the pot than anything else. Football is supposed to build character, but even professional athletes cry like little girls when they get hammered. Suck it up and take a beating like a man.
I have to agree with Dennis Pilkinton on the vertical vs. controlled passing. It is harder nowadays in many ways because of the West Coast 8 yd. passes. So, that would come into play. It might take 40-45 completions or a couple of plays in the game where the pursuit completely breaks apart and we have 70-75 yards after the catch on a play.
True, the Yanks had some guys who would be great. But, were they in the early 50s. I know Donovan was very early in his career (1st or 2nd year, cant remember off the top of my head) for example.
This is off-topic, but I have a suggestion for a catch-all advanced stat, and I don't know where else to send it. It seems to me that NYA and ANYA end up under-valuing running QB's because they tend to get sacked more; how about a stat combining rushing and passing yards, divided by combined rushing and passing attempts; call it Total Yards/Att; then add in TD's, INT's and sacks to get Total Adjusted Net Yards/Att or TANYA. I think it would be great to see how the overall impact of running QB's like Steve Young, Randall Cunningham and Mike Vick compares to pocket passers like Marino and Manning. Maybe there's already something like this out there, but I don't know of it....
PS ...I meant to say "add in total TD's, rushing and passing". You could factor in recieving stats too, but it's probably not worth the effort.
@AYC: http://www.pro-football-reference.com/blog/?p=3266
Not exactly the same as you're saying, but it's at least going the same direction.
Thanks!
... I like mine better, though. To me it seems arbitrary and unjustified to treat rushing yardage differently from passing yardage.
Just for the hell of it, I figured out TANYA for 7 big-name QB's of the last 30 years (not counting this season); I'll list ANYA along side it for comparison:
TANYA-ANYA
PM 6.92-7.10
SY 6.88-6.85
JM 6.45-6.60
TB 6.37-6.65
DM 6.36-6.55
BF 5.85-5.98
JE 5.57-5.60
Running QB's aren't rewarded too much, because yards/rush is usually much lower than yards/pass, and running QB's have a higher % of rushing attempts. A terrible runner like Marino isn't hurt too badly because he rarely attempted to run.
I really liked this article, but I agree with other posters about the semi-pro comments. Last time I checked, the game featured two NFL teams, which is a fully professional organization. If you are paid, then you are a professional. But I completely agree that teams ran up the score more in those days.
Was it not the case that before 1951 everyone was eligible to receive passes, including the centers & guards? Could that have contributed to amassing passing yards?
That is correct. From the NFL Record and Fact Book, 1951: "A rule was passed that no tackle, guard, or center would be eligible to catch a forward pass, January 18."
But I'm not sure I understand what you're getting at. Van Brocklin's record happened after the rule change ...