SITE NEWS: We are moving all of our site and company news into a single blog for Sports-Reference.com. We'll tag all PFR content, so you can quickly and easily find the content you want.
Also, our existing PFR blog rss feed will be redirected to the new site's feed.
Pro-Football-Reference.com ยป Sports Reference
For more from Chase and Jason, check out their work at Football Perspective and The Big Lead.
2011 Hall of Fame Polls: Marshall Faulk
Just the facts on Marshall Faulk:
- 10th in career rushing yards (12,279)
- Tied for 7th in career rushing TDs (100)
- 4th in career yards from scrimmage (19,154)
- 7th in total career touchdowns (136)
- 1st among RB in career receiving yds (6,875) and 2nd among RB in receptions (767)
- Tied for 19th in career weighted Approximate Value (133)
- NFL AV leader in 1999, 2000, and 2001
- 1999, 2000, & 2001 AP Offensive Player of the Year; 2000 NFL AP & PFWA MVP; 2001 NFL PFWA MVP
- 7x Pro Bowler, 3x 1st Team All-Pro
- Super Bowl champion in 1999
- 2nd, 8th, and 12th on Chase's list of the most dominant RB seasons ever
- 4th on Chase's lists of the most dominant regular-season and overall RB careers
- 2001 was 10th-most dominant postseason by a RB, according to Chase
- AV's top Rams RB since 1950
- Two of the greatest fantasy seasons of all-time in 2000-2001
Given all of this data, what do you think? Is Marshall Faulk a worthy Hall of Famer?
This entry was posted on Thursday, January 27th, 2011 at 10:48 am and is filed under Great Historical Players, History, HOF, PI Finds, Player articles, Running Backs. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

No debate from me, Faulk was great.
In 1998, he helped the Colts to a 3-13 record in Peyton Manning's first season. In 1999, the Colts released Faulk, drafted Edgerrin James, and went 13-3 in P.Manning's second season.
(OK, so St Louis improved from a 4-12 Lambs team to a 13-3 Rams team over that same span...)
Faulk is either the 1st or 2nd choice in this year's class, depending on your point of view about Deion Sanders.
DaHook, Faulk really had his problems in those '99 playoffs with the Rams. He ended up with 38 carries for only 82 yds. which comes to 2.2 yds. per carry (he did have 1 rushing TD also in those 3 games). But Kurt Warner more than made up for that with his passing. But other than that, he had a very good career with a lot of great games and is very deserving of this.
Faulk was a great running back and receiver. I would vote for him.
DaHook,
That Colts' record might have had something to do with that new QB growing up and developing a repertoire with some WR named Harrison.
This is crazy, we are now analyzing faulk based team wins? If thats the criteria, then steven jackson is worse than any rb on a winning team. To me, there is no doubt hes a hall of famer. There was no rb who could rush and receive and be stellar at both, thought you could argue craig. Sometimes i wonder which is the more explosive offensive weapon-moss or faulk? In many ways, when both are in systems that allow their skills to blossom, they become mismatch nightmares.
Easy choice for the (first ballot) HOF, though I think his all time ranking is probably too high for where most people would put him.
Absolute no-brainer HOFer.
First ballot. I did a breakdown of running backs recently and came up with a Qualititative and a Quantitative list of the league's best All-time RBs. Looking at it in either light, Faulk was a top 5 back both ways. In my opinion, there are six elite runners of the post 1950s backs: Payton, Sanders, Smith, Brown, Tomlinson, and Faulk. He is not only a HOFer, but he's probably among the top 1/4 of all HOF running backs. This is such a slam dunk that it really doesn't need debate.
He was the best back in the late 90's and 00's. He is definitely a first-balloter.
#10: No O.J. or Dickerson? I might throw Earl Campbell in there, too.
I would agree that Faulk is a lock. He was arguably the best offensive player in the game from 1999-2001.
How many backs had a better 4-year stretch than his last in Indy through 2001 in STL? HE shattered Y.F.S records every season. Easy top 5/6 back in NFL history. For a guy who was 1st or 2nd in either MVP voting and/or O.P.O.T.Y voting for three straight years, he remains strikingly underrated.
Who was the better offensive weapon, faulk or moss? Remember, you must factor in as many details as you can-for instance, moss's deep threat abilities versus the other routes he ran as well as faulk as a runner and receiver. According to Greg Cosell, both players really did force defenses into a bind and really, only a few non qb players have ever done that. In my mind, as scary as moss was, and in keeping in mind how he opened up everything for players around him, faulk could hurt you in many more ways and with a clever coordinator, was very difficult to stop.
This might be the easiest selection for this year.
This year's eligible running backs should be, in my opinion, ranked as follows:
1) Faulk (a first ballot guy);
2) Martin (a no-doubter who may have to wait a year or two);
3) Bettis (close, but I bet he gets in eventually).
My inductees for this year would be Faulk, Deion, Roaf, Dawson, and Hanburger, who should dedicate his induction speech to Sean Lahman if he does get in. He won my vote.
Faulk was also the first rookie to be named MVP of the Pro Bowl.
Faulk is a first ballot selection for the Hall of Fame.
Faulk shouldn't be analyzed for wins. Faulk have average quarterbacks at best with the colts before Peyton Manning with Jim Harbaugh, Paul Justin and a damaged goods version of Don Majkowski. Faulk had Manning at the wrong time. Manning was a rookie in 1998. Marvin Harrison was in his 3rd year with the Colts back when Peyton Manning was drafted.
There should be 7 people in the Hall of Fame for 2011 class.
Marshall Faulk
Deion Sanders
Cris Carter
William Roaf (he was 1990's & 2000's all decade teams)
Cortez Kennedy
Chris Hanburger
Les Ritchter
Bob S. Says:
January 27th, 2011 at 3:32 pm
DaHook, Faulk really had his problems in those '99 playoffs with the Rams. He ended up with 38 carries for only 82 yds. which comes to 2.2 yds. per carry (he did have 1 rushing TD also in those 3 games). But Kurt Warner more than made up for that with his passing. But other than that, he had a very good career with a lot of great games and is very deserving of this.
___________________________________________________
But what about the 13 receptions for 175 yards and 2 TDs in those 3 games? How do you think Warner was able to make up for it?