SITE NEWS: We are moving all of our site and company news into a single blog for Sports-Reference.com. We'll tag all PFR content, so you can quickly and easily find the content you want.
Also, our existing PFR blog rss feed will be redirected to the new site's feed.
Pro-Football-Reference.com » Sports Reference
For more from Chase and Jason, check out their work at Football Perspective and The Big Lead.
2011 Hall of Fame Polls: Ed Sabol
Continuing our 2011 Hall of Fame finalist polls, let's get some opinions on Ed Sabol -- and, specifically, the role of NFL Films in shaping football's success in the second half of the 20th century.
Since 1964, when Sabol convinced the NFL that it needed its own motion picture company to document games for posterity, NFL Films has marketed pro football in an epic style that clearly resonates with fans. Ira Kaufman of the Tampa Tribune summed up Sabol's influence nicely in an article this week:
"There are only 18 contributors in the Pro Football Hall of Fame, and Sabol never owned an NFL team or served as commissioner. But that doesn't mean this 94-year-old visionary doesn't deserve to be recognized for his unique contributions since starting NFL Films almost 50 years ago.
'I think NFL Films was as important to the growth and success of the NFL as any one single thing that ever took place,'' says former 49ers owner Ed DeBartolo, who lives in Tampa. 'It put the teams and players in the forefront of fans' minds.'
At some point in the 1960s, pro football vaulted past baseball as America's most popular sport; NFL Films played a pivotal role in that transformation."
Now, for some sample videos... This is 100% classic NFL Films:
And here's a good example of the modern NFL Films style:
So, what do you think? Should Sabol be in the Hall of Fame for his contribution to the NFL's success over the past 50 years?
This entry was posted on Tuesday, February 1st, 2011 at 12:04 pm and is filed under HOF. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Ed belongs into the Hall of fame.
The problem I got is the Hall of Fame needs a separate ballot for contributors, general mangers, owners and anyone that is not a retired football up to 25 years after they retire. It isn't fair currently to contributors or players for them being on the ballot for getting 5 people into the hall before counting the 2 players senior committee picks.
I don't have Ed going into this class because of quality of players on the ballot though.
It is a great quality of class but Ed Sabol more than deserves it and I do think and hope he'll get elected on Saturday. His candidacy is gaining steam and with him being 94 years old they should elect him while he's still with us.
Sabol absoluelty, positively, definitely belongs in. His films and the shows he produced did more to popularize the NFL than any other thing other than the invention of television.
In our world of ESPN and all the other all-sports and plenty-sports cable networks younger people have no idea and older people forget what it was like when none of those existed -- there were only three to maybe seven TV channels (in the biggest cities), none of them were sports (except for a few minutes on the news ) .... and NFL home games were blacked out.
The *only* way a fan could see what was going on around the league (including in his own team's most recent home game) was to watch the "week in the NFL" shows that Sabol produced that got put on by local TV stations all all different hours to fill time. As a kid I used to stay up to 1 am to watch these things -- they were addicting.
Plus he did a whole lot more than just game highlights. He did history and informative shows -- I still remember one on "screaming coaches" where he put the cameras and mikes on Vince Lombardi and Norm Van Brocklin duing a Packers-Vikes game. Every third word was bleeped, but what you could hear was really revealing. Lombardi was screaming: "You think you're ever going to the Pro Bowl again playing like that?... Are they all right when they say you're too old and slow? ...." Everthing was a challenge. Van Brocklin was screaming: "When you call such stupid plays what else can happen? ... Girls pull hair better than you tackle .... When your career is over you're going to be pumping gas, remember I told you". Everything was demeaning. Look at their W-L records. That was more than just a fascinating look at the sidelines in a football game you'd see nowhere else, it was a life lesson.
Sabol effectively was ESPN for the NFL for decades. The fact that I still remember films like that decades later as the rest of my brain is falling apart says something by itself. Multiply me by millions for his impact.
I would probably not be as big of a football fan as I am if not for watching NFL Films videos when I was a kid. Surely there are others like me.
As far as I know, MLB and NBA have not come close to duplicating the excellence of NFL Films and I think they suffer for it.
#5 - I feel exactly the same way. I remember seeing an NFL Films show about Earl Campbell on a Sunday morning when I was about 8 years old, and just being totally enraptured by it. Then you would pretend you were in those epic moments, with the music and the slow-motion.
MLB has tried to apply the techniques of NFL Films to baseball and it falls flat. You just can't duplicate the magic of the original.
If only one person would be elected, definetelly Sabol is the most deserving. It's long overdue, he should have been already enshrined since at least 20 years ago.
No doubt deserves induction and hopefully his son, whom I'm almost positive would be the one presenting Ed in Canton in August, follows soon after.
That stated, I agree completely that there should be a separate "contributors" ballot similar to what they do with the Seniors nominees and I have a feeling that Ed and Steve would feel the same way. Doesn't even have to be every time. They could do it, say, once every three years.
Facenda should be in there too.
Sabol has to go in. The guy's 94, and the honor is a hollow one if they wait until after he's dead to give it to him.
I agree with others who say there ought to be a separate slot for non-players, but we have to work with the system we have. There aren't seven guys on this ballot who are more worthy than him.
Absolutely. NFL Films has done so much to add to the mystique and grandeur of the game. No player has created more NFL fans than Ed Sabol has.
If they're going to put him in, they should do it this year. It was disgraceful that they waited until Bob Hayes was dead before putting him in, he was an obvious Hall of Famer because of his impact on the game and his numbers.
But I don't think Sabol deserves to be there. His impact is on the popularity of the game, not on the game itself. If you're using that as a criterion for admission, then you have to put in the guy who invented the pointspread (if you can figure out who that was), you're looking at commentators and studio guys, and the Hall of Fame Selection Committee itself.
I don't think you can tell the history of professional football without including NFL Films(which makes sense since the company exists in part to preserve and present the history of pro football). And I don't believe the company's impact is peripheral. For a sport that was tailor-made for television, the cinema-style visual storytelling pioneered by Ed and Steve Sabol fit the sport perfectly. NFL Films didn't just increase the NFL's popularity...it was a significant contributor in turning pro football into a cultural juggernaut.
Both Ed and Steve Sabol should've been inducted years ago.
No way. Ed before Steve. I'm not even sure Steve belongs. Daddy invented and Steve tagged along.
Facenda before Steve, at least.
I'm kind of interested in what the no voters have to say (at the moment it's 7 of 92 votes). Not in an argumentitve way, but in a, I can't even make up a point as to why someone would say no way....
I grew up with Ed Sabol’s NFL Films introducing me to the game of football before I watched my first game. I was hooked right away watching the slo-mos, stirring jazz music, and John Facenda’s captivating narration. My neighborhood friends were the same way and we had a lot of kids on my block. We would play football on the lot and replicate the action from NFL Films pieces more so than from any game. As we got older, of course, we would follow our teams by sitting through entire games, but without NFL Films we might have taken less interest to the sport.
As stated before, home games were blacked out (prior to 1973) and unless you stayed up late to watch the late news you missed the highlights of your favorite team. But NFL Films captured not only the highlights of your local team, but of all the NFL and AFL. Ed Sabol’s company really became an integral part of the indoctrination of fans toward the game of football. His productions were featured on many airline flights and reeled in the business travelers who were also transfixed by Sabol’s style of storytelling. The writing was superb. The metaphors (“John Brockington was tougher than a boiled owl”) and historical references (“Like Tennyson’s light brigade, these Cowboy running backs charged happily, happily onward,”) used in descriptions of the game were often educational, if not original.
One of my only regrets with anything associated with pro football is that I didn’t find out at an earlier age how to officially nominate Ed Sabol. I woulod have taken great pleasure in being able to say I was the one who nominated him. I’d do the same for his son, Steve, too. But I suspect that there are many other fans out there, young and old, who can appreciate what Ed Sabol created.
Think about it. When the next Hall of Fame class gets enshrined the first thing people will see is the best highlights of the players inducted. And all those highlights were made possible by one man and his vision for capturing pro football. I vote yes and if Ed does not make it, then changes need to be made so that worthy contributors are rightfully inducted and not held back.
Patrick W., that is beautifully stated.
Thomas,
The argument against is simply this: the Hall isn't for fans, no matter what contribution they made as fans.
Ed Sabol is the greatest football fan in history, and a whole lot of his work is in the Hall, but it doesn't get him a bust beside Barry Sanders.
#14: Please tell me you're not serious? To say that Steve "tagged along" is, frankly, ignorant and insulting.
#19: Then please enlighten me O Sagacious One.
Well, for starters, he was the one who wrote the scripts that Facenda read from.
For further reading, go here -
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1122516/index.htm
and here -
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/joe_posnanski/02/03/sabol/index.html
and here -
http://books.google.com/books?id=Gc5XDDEgrRUC&printsec=frontcover&dq=the+super+70%27s&hl=en&ei=5CdKTaDLAs6RgQfSloD_Dw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CCsQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false
Congratulations to the Sabol family!!! It was long overdue but so well deserved! I sincerely hope a wing opens up in Canton to honor the folks who brought so many fans a lasting memory of the greatest plays, players, and coaches of the great game of pro football.
Ed was truly a legend and made a living covering the legends of pro football! I can't wait to visit Canton and see that bust who brought so many lasting memories to my neighborhood. His work was even honored in my high school English class by a former NFL player who thought Sabol's work was worthy of study. It was!
I was the majority stockholder of the Philadelphia Eagles when NFL Films came on board.
I had no doubt and all of the owners at that time knew that if the league was going big time, it needed Ed Sabol. Not only did the league get Ed Sabol, it was blessed with Steve Sabol.
The success of the League, and the TV contracts being awarded today, is in large part due to NFL Films, Ed and Steve Sabol. It will be a disgrace if Ed Sabol is not voted in
Thank you
Jerry Wolman
Didn't know where to post this. I wanted to say to Steve Sabol I wish him (and his family) the very best of care with the brain tumor. I have appreciated Steve's work and his contributions to the game of football and especially the personal replies to me early on during my indoctrination into NFL Films as a fan.
I am in your corner, Steve, as I'm sure many fans are. I know you can beat anything that besets you and pray that you'll summon up the strength that I know you were given at birth and continually blessed with. My prayers are with you and so are my Dad's from high above.
-Patrick W
3 CHEERS FOR ED SABOL ... Why Ed belongs in Canton.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
1) Pro Football started taking statistics and record keeping when the Sabol's arrived. Football was for Neanderthals. College football was held in much higher esteem. 1958 O/T championship game got the juices flowing. Ed Sabol is why I am reading football stats on April 20.
2) NFL Films (nee: Blair Films?) had the chutzpah to record all games in color.
3) Their first game was the wicked-cold championship in 1962 at Yankee Stadium between the Packers and Giants. They were given a 1 year contract for 1963 season. They still work on a 1-year contract 48 years later.
4) The organization loves and respects the tradition and quirks of the game like a "baseball" fan. They mix this passion with a fanatic NFL work ethic. Your game film was ready on Tuesday. They did this long before FedEx, digital camera's, MAC's,
5) I've seen Ed deliver stories about the people who made the game. His piece on Vince Lombardi brought back memories on serving 6:00 AM mass in the middle of winter. I "got" Lombardi after that. The person who went to mass every day was working his butt off to keep his ship afloat. Sad that another person who went mass every day was John Unitas. Lombardi and Unitas left the party too early.
I "got" the Redskins after his coverage on George Allen & the "Ram-skins" (Balti-morons are not supposed to get the Redskins).
6) The Sabol's were football fans in Philadelphia. That speaks volumes.
4) Ed is 95 years old ...