SITE NEWS: We are moving all of our site and company news into a single blog for Sports-Reference.com. We'll tag all PFR content, so you can quickly and easily find the content you want.
Also, our existing PFR blog rss feed will be redirected to the new site's feed.
Pro-Football-Reference.com ยป Sports Reference
For more from Chase and Jason, check out their work at Football Perspective and The Big Lead.
Will Chris Johnson’s salary demands prohibit Tennessee from winning the Super Bowl?
Tennessee running back Chris Johnson is currently holding out of training camp because he wants more money. A lot more money. Some think that isn't a prudent decision for the Titans. As a running back, Johnson might wear down in a year or two and will therefore be overpaid over the life of his contract. I'll resist the urge to go on another rant on rookie salaries -- owners and GMs argue that rookies don't deserve big bucks because they're unproven and that veterans don't deserve big bucks because their future potential is limited -- and instead look at a question posed by Ryan Wilson at Cbssports.
Look, there's no disputing that Johnson and Adrian Peterson are the two best running backs in the NFL. But the difference between them and the NFL's 32nd-best back is negligible when compared to the differences between, say, Tom Brady or Peyton Manning and whoever your candidate is for the league's worst starting quarterback. The same holds for wide receivers, left tackles, cornerbacks, safeties -- basically every position but running back.
So why is that?
For starters, the shelf life for a top-flight running back is remarkably short.... [Johnson's] rushed for more yards since 2008 than anybody in the league. That also means Johnson logged a lot of carries, too. In three seasons, he's carried the ball 251, 358 and 316 times. Johnson's yards per carry have gone from 4.9 to 5.6 to 4.3 over that time. [T]here's no disputing that Johnson wasn't nearly as effective in 2010 as he was in 2009. ...More than that: even with his jaw-dropping performance in '09, the Titans won eight games and missed the playoffs. In 2010, they won just six times.
We could blame that on the precarious quarterback situation, but that's our point.
Here's what FootballOutsiders.com president and ESPN.com columnist Aaron Schatz told CBSSports.com about Johnson's demands for a substantial pay bump. "When was the last time a team with a big-name, big-money back went to the Super Bowl, or even had the best regular-season record in the league? I suppose the 2009 Vikings came close. Otherwise, do you have to go back to the 2005 Seahawks? The best offenses in the modern NFL simply aren't built around a single running back."
...If you're still not convinced, how about this (from something we wrote earlier this month): "The previous eight Super Bowl winners didn't have a high-priced, top-5 running back on the roster. What they did have, however, was a franchise quarterback. Teams can survive without one but not the other."
It's the last part of that article that inspired me to write this post. We all know that a great quarterback is more valuable than a great running back. And a great quarterback gives you a big leg up on winning the Super Bowl. My response to that is, what does that have to do with signing Chris Johnson?
Giving Johnson megabucks has no negative impact (and arguably a very positive one) on whether or not the Titans have a great quarterback for the next ten years. Tennessee drafted QB Jake Locker in the first round of this year's draft. If he's going to be a future star, well, Tennessee already has him locked up for the next four or five years. If the next great Titans QB is Matt Hasselbeck, well, the Titans have him locked up for the remainder of his viable days as a starting quarterback.
But the principle goes deeper than just the QB situation in Tennessee. Paying any star RB is much more closer to the "mutually exclusive" end of the spectrum than the "either/or" side when choosing between paying your RB and getting a franchise QB. Let's take a look back at the past 15 SB winners:
Aaron Rodgers - drafted by Green Bay
Drew Brees - signed as a free agent by New Orleans
Ben Roethlisberger - drafted by Pittsburgh
Eli Manning - acquired on draft day by New York
Peyton Manning - drafted by Indianapolis
Ben Roethlisberger - drafted by Pittsburgh
Tom Brady - drafted by New England
Tom Brady - drafted by New England
Brad Johnson - signed as a free agent by Tampa Bay
Tom Brady - drafted by New England
Trent Dilfer - signed as a free agent by Baltimore
Kurt Warner - signed as a free agent by St. Louis
John Elway - acquired by Denver following the draft
John Elway - acquired by Denver following the draft
Brett Favre - acquired via trade
Ten of the last 15 Super Bowl winners got their starting QB the same way the Titans grabbed Locker: on draft day (or shortly thereafter). Baltimore and St. Louis signed backup quarterbacks for chump change, then shocked the world by winning Super Bowls with those passers. Favre was acquired for the cost of a first round pick, but did not hit Green Bay in the wallet (just its soul).
Only two of the 15 QBs could be classified as big-money free agent signings, the sort of acquisitions that presumably would be prevented if one were to tie up huge money with a star running back. Johnson and Brees were big off-season signings and landed large contracts. But there were extenuating circumstances with both players.
In 2000, Johnson was a 32-year-old QB who threw 15 INTs against just 11 TDs; with the exception of a strong completion percentage (era-adjusted), he was entirely average that season. He was considered injury prone, and for the second time in three years lost his starting job to Jeff George. The Redskins elected to keep George for the '01 year and let Johnson test the waters in free agency. That much was a foregone conclusion after Johnson's coach was fired and the quarterback took shots at the owner in the press.
The Chargers dealt with a similar situation. San Diego decided it was time to give young Philip Rivers the starting job, a decision that doesn't seem unsound despite Brees' success in New Orleans. The decision was made even more obvious when in the last game of the '05 season, Brees suffered a serious injury to his shoulder. The Chargers chose not to franchise Brees, and the injured quarterback went to Miami to sign there. The Dolphins' medical staff did not give the front office the green light to sign the former Charger, as Miami was worried that the injury could ruin his career. Instead, Brees signed a big-money contract with the only other team that was looking: New Orleans.
In the end, New Orleans and Tampa Bay still threw big money to acquire their Super Bowl winning quarterbacks. But those were unique situations in that those quarterbacks came with more questions than answers. They were specifically allowed to hit the market via free agency. That rarely happens these days, however.
Think about the last big free agent signings at the position. Matt Hasselbeck was the biggest move this year; Vince Young (Phi) and Tarvaris Jackson (Sea) were the consolation prizes. Last year, it was Derek Anderson (Ari) and Jake Delhomme (Cle). In 2009 the only big noisemakers were A.J. Feeley going to Carolina and Trent Green going to St. Louis, before whatshisname went to Minnesota. The top free agents in 2008? Daunte Culpepper (Det) and Quinn Gray (KC). Rex Grossman (Chi) and Derek Anderson (Cle) stayed with their teams, weakening the class. In '07, maybe it was Jeff Garcia (TB), Brad Johnson (Dal) or David Carr (Car).
There are trades, of course. Kevin Kolb (Phi to Ari), Charlie Whitehurst (SD to Sea) Jason Campbell (Was to Oak), Matt Cassel (NE to KC), Kyle Orton and Jay Cutler (Den/Chi) and Matt Schaub (Atl to Hou) all switched teams via trade. But it should be glaringly obvious that elite quarterbacks that teams think are going to win Super Bowls don't become available. End of story.
Tennessee would be much better off if it had an elite caliber quarterback. But Tennessee isn't going to find one by throwing a zillion dollars at Aaron Rodgers, Philip Rivers, Ben Roethlisberger, Matt Ryan, Tony Romo or Matt Schaub anytime soon. If the Titans are going to have a top-five quarterback in 2013, they will do so in one of five ways:
-- Jake Locker will become a star
-- Matt Hasselbeck will find the fountain of youth
-- Tennessee will take a chance on a risky free agent QB
-- Tennessee will take a chance and trade for a risky QB
-- Tennessee will spend another draft pick on a QB
None of those options are going to be off the table if they sign Chris Johnson to a mega deal. And, of course, the team is going to be in much better shape if they do sign Johnson. The idea that elite quarterbacks are available if you have the money is a fallacy. Until that happens, there's no reason why Tennessee shouldn't shell out big bucks on one of the few truly elite players in the game.
This entry was posted on Thursday, August 18th, 2011 at 10:16 am and is filed under Running Backs. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Elway was drafted by the Colts and traded before he ever got fitted for a helmet.
Thanks, Oneblankspace. I've revised.
Agreed for the most part, but spending a ton of money on CJ could stop them from bringing in lineman or receivers to promote Jake Locker's career. He'll do them no good on his back or having no one open to throw to.
If the next great Titans QB isn't Locker or Hasselbeck, though, doesn't the positive presence of Johnson hurt their chances of finding their next great QB in the draft?
The average starting QB gets about 12 AV per season and is worth 1 win (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/blog/?p=581). Say Johnson repeats his 2009 output (not likely, btw) -- he's worth maybe 1.6 wins, 2 at the most. Is it better for Tennessee to have those 2 wins (and still probably not be a legit contender), or drop down 2 wins worth of draft position in order to find that next great QB in the draft?
Sorry... you're writing an article about the Titans getting to the Super Bowl as anything other than spectators? Why, exactly?
Hey Chase,
Thanks for linking to my post.
I should clarify: my point wasn't that a team can't have a franchise QB and devote a non-trivial portion of their salary cap to a running back. They certainly can do that. What I was trying to convey is that given limited resources (the salary cap), the need for quality depth across the roster due to injuries, and the fact that RBs, in general, are among the most fungible positions on a team, the Titans would be wise to not pay CJ what he's asking. Or even make him the NFL's highest-paid running back.
What I wanted to get across in that last paragraph is that breaking the bank on a RB never got a team to the Super Bowl. Breaking the bank on a QB has. But that wasn't my takeaway point. More like a throwaway line. Still, shoulda been more clear about that.
Enjoy your work,
ryan
Hey Ryan,
Thanks for commenting. I think in an abstract sense you might be right, but the Titans only have a few choices. They can play hardball and never give in, play hardball and give in for awhile, or give in soon. Sure, maybe the ideal roster management move isn't to have the highest paid RB in the league. To the extent that they can trade him for good value, that might be the avenue to look at. But I think Tennessee is crazy if they don't get their best player on some football field this season.
Unless they change the rules on pass blocking and defensive pass interference and other such modifications to the pre-1970s levels, there is no reason to believe that you need an elite RB to be a successful team. I have no idea how CJ thinks he is negotiating from a position of power here.
If I were the Titans I'd let him sit out all year. They're not going to win anyway so why spend more than 10% of the cap on a guy who at best is only going to take your team from 5-11 to 7-9?
"breaking the bank on a RB never got a team to the Super Bowl."
In 1999, the Rams traded for Marshall Faulk and then gave him the biggest contract in team history. 2 NFC Championships and a Superbowl later, I doubt they regret it.
Of course, Faulk was a huge contributor in the passing game, where Johnson and Peterson are no great shakes. Is it really clear those guys are more valuable than more rounded players like Charles, Foster and MJD?
I would try to pay him as one of the top RB (I am all for rewarding great past performance if someone was underpaid). But if he insists on being paid as one of the top 5 players in the league, they just can't do that.
@9 Johnson set the league record for yards from scrimmage in 2009 including 500 yards receiving at 10.1Y/R. He won't be remembered as WR/RB, but he's certainly no slouch in the passing game.
The fact is that Ten should pay CJ a boatload of money. The reason why is there is no such thing as a long term contract in the NFL. Very few players have contracts that really run more than 3 seasons and I doubt CJ is going to be the exception. He wants a contract that has 6 or 7 seasons in the press release, but I doubt he is expecting this much guaranteed money. Like just about every other non-QB out there, if you give him $30M over 3 years with some theoretical money he will never actually see for the next 3, he'll sign.
And it won't prevent Ten from signing other quality players at other positions. First of all, there are almost never any top notch players in free agency. This season we had, who, Asomugha? Well, he's 29 so whatever longevity concerns apply double. Elite pass rushers, elite LT, elite QBs - these guys are simply never available in free agency. The available free agents are generally, at best, acceptable starters at those types of positions. And I'll take CJ over your average LT, even if LT is a more important position. And Ten still has cap space anyways. Given the age of their team I'll bet they have a lot.
The summary here is that signing CJ for big bucks isn't going to prevent Ten from grabbing other premium players in the short run and in the long run, well, I doubt he's really expecting a true long term deal.
The notion of Johnson as an uber-elite back is based on the one season where the Titans basically stopped playing football and started feeding him the ball so that he could break the record. He's not a true 3 down, 300+ carry back like the bulk of the 2000 yard club, and he certainly doesn't compare to Barry Sanders, the remaining 2000 yard guy after OJ, Dickerson, Lewis, and Davis.
My concern with CJ is that while he deserves to be paid, but there's no way to structure the contract that won't handicap the team moving forward. If you front-load it, pay him a kajillion dollars this year then (say) $1M for the duration, he'll either resume his whining once that last big check is cashed, or pull a Fat Albert and stop showing up. I don't know that stats have been kept about yards per whine, but I believe that whiners have a shorter lifespan than the AP's and the LT's.
To keep him motivated, they need something that's loaded with incentives, but the Titans are so far from being a contender that such a contract would keep them from building (and keeping) a contending team.
For all the talk about QB's vs. RB's, the consistent theme that runs through the teams that get there is organizational stability and strength. Sure, every once in a while a team like the Cardinals or Bears gets hot and sneaks through, but by and large, the teams that make it are representative of the elite organizations. The Titans aren't one of them, so they should concentrate on doing what it takes to put bums in the seats to watch the bums on the field.
As a Colts fan, I'm fine with them showing Chris Johnson the money. Building your team with your running back as your focal point has rarely worked in the last 10 years. It's all about your quarterback, giving him weapons and at least average pass protection and having a strong defense to defend and frustrate the other qb. I'll Green Bay defined that, except for maybe not being extremely strong on the offensive line. Certainly, time will tell on locker, but as of now they look like a team with a question at qb(some thought Locker was a reach), very good offensive line, and below average receiving corps. Britt did show some promise when Vince Young started last year.
I do think post #8 nailed it on the head. All CJ would do is help them win 2 more games or so. If i were a titan fan, i'd hope for my team to shop him for a draft pick. If you can win Super Bowls with James Starks, Brandon Jackson, and John Kuhn.. and all the while guys like Maurice Jones Drew, Arian Foster, Chris Johnson, Adrian Peterson sit at home for 8-8 or worse teams, it's a sign of how the game has changed.
mutually exclusive is the same as either/or
I think you mean mutually compatible or something like that.
I was a little confused.